Comment on

• Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: issues of precision and bias.

  West MJ. West MJ. Trends Neurosci. 1999 Feb;22(2):51-61. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01362-9. Trends Neurosci. 1999. PMID: 10092043 Review.
• Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional cell counting: a practical perspective.

  Benes FM, Lange N. Benes FM, et al. Trends Neurosci. 2001 Jan;24(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01660-x. Trends Neurosci. 2001. PMID: 11163882
• Cost-effectiveness of 3-D cell counting.

  Geuna S. Geuna S. Trends Neurosci. 2001 Jul;24(7):374-5; author reply 378-80. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01852-x. Trends Neurosci. 2001. PMID: 11467285 No abstract available.
• 2-D versus 3-D cell counting--a debate. What is an optical disector?

  West MJ, Slomanka L. West MJ, et al. Trends Neurosci. 2001 Jul;24(7):374; author reply 378-80. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01832-4. Trends Neurosci. 2001. PMID: 11467286 No abstract available.
• Is stereology 'unbiased'?

  Baddeley A. Baddeley A. Trends Neurosci. 2001 Jul;24(7):375-6; author reply 378-80. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01833-6. Trends Neurosci. 2001. PMID: 11467287 No abstract available.
• Commentary of the paper by Benes and Lange.

  Coggeshall RE. Coggeshall RE. Trends Neurosci. 2001 Jul;24(7):376-7; author reply 378-80. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01890-7. Trends Neurosci. 2001. PMID: 11467288 No abstract available.
• Advanced use of 3-D methods for counting neurons.

  Schmitz C, Korr H, Perl DP, Hof PR. Schmitz C, et al. Trends Neurosci. 2001 Jul;24(7):377-80. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01834-8. Trends Neurosci. 2001. PMID: 11467289 No abstract available.