Histopathology of cochlear implants in humans
- PMID: 11558767
- DOI: 10.1177/000348940111000914
Histopathology of cochlear implants in humans
Abstract
The insertion of an intrascalar electrode array during cochlear implantation causes immediate damage to the inner ear and may result in delayed onset of additional damage that may interfere with neuronal stimulation. To date, there have been reports on fewer than 50 temporal bone specimens from patients who had undergone implantation during life. The majority of these were single-channel implants, whereas the majority of implants inserted today are multichannel systems. This report presents the histopathologic findings in temporal bones from 8 individuals who in life had undergone multichannel cochlear implantation, with particular attention to the type and location of trauma and to long-term changes within the cochlea. The effect of these changes on spiral ganglion cell counts and the correlation between speech comprehension and spiral ganglion cell counts were calculated. In 4 of the 8 cases, the opposite, unimplanted ear was available for comparison. In 3 of the 4 cases, there was no significant difference between the spiral ganglion cell counts on the implanted and unimplanted sides. In addition, in this series of 8 cases, there was an apparent negative correlation between residual spiral ganglion cell count and hearing performance during life as measured by single-syllable word recognition. This finding suggests that abnormalities in the central auditory pathways are at least as important as spiral ganglion cell loss in limiting the performance of implant users.
Similar articles
-
Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Sep;117(3 Pt 1):220-8. doi: 10.1016/s0194-5998(97)70178-5. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997. PMID: 9334769
-
Is word recognition correlated with the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells and electrode insertion depth in human subjects with cochlear implants?Laryngoscope. 2005 Apr;115(4):672-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80. Laryngoscope. 2005. PMID: 15805879
-
Multichannel cochlear implants: relation of histopathology to performance.Laryngoscope. 2006 Aug;116(8):1310-20. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000227176.09500.28. Laryngoscope. 2006. PMID: 16885730
-
Histopathology of the inner ear relevant to cochlear implantation.Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;64:31-49. doi: 10.1159/000094643. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16891835 Review.
-
Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes.Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):411-27. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182064bda. Ear Hear. 2011. PMID: 21248642 Review.
Cited by
-
Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?Hear Res. 2019 Jan;371:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Nov 3. Hear Res. 2019. PMID: 30423498 Free PMC article.
-
Intracochlear inflammatory response to cochlear implant electrodes in humans.Otol Neurotol. 2014 Oct;35(9):1545-51. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000540. Otol Neurotol. 2014. PMID: 25122600 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of impedance field telemetry after one day of activation in cochlear implant recipients.PLoS One. 2017 Mar 6;12(3):e0173367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173367. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28264044 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal changes in impedance of implanted adults for various cochlear segments.Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2017 Aug;37(4):312-319. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1471. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2017. PMID: 28872161 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Physiological Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implants.J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Oct;28(9):786-798. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16144. J Am Acad Audiol. 2017. PMID: 28972468 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical