Comparative Study
doi: 10.1002/pd.134.
What is the true fetal loss rate in pregnancies affected by trisomy 21 and how does this influence whether first trimester detection rates are superior to those in the second trimester?
- PMID: 11559916
- DOI: 10.1002/pd.134
Item in Clipboard
Comparative Study
What is the true fetal loss rate in pregnancies affected by trisomy 21 and how does this influence whether first trimester detection rates are superior to those in the second trimester?
Prenat Diagn.
2001 Sep.
No abstract available
Comment on
-
Estimating the spontaneous loss of Down syndrome fetuses between the times of chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis and livebirth.Prenat Diagn. 1998 Oct;18(10):1045-54. Prenat Diagn. 1998. PMID: 9826896 Review.
-
Fetal loss in Down syndrome pregnancies.Prenat Diagn. 1999 Feb;19(2):142-5. Prenat Diagn. 1999. PMID: 10215072
Similar articles
-
Effect of Cell-Free DNA Screening vs Direct Invasive Diagnosis on Miscarriage Rates in Women With Pregnancies at High Risk of Trisomy 21: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2018 Aug 14;320(6):557-565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9396. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 30120476 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Screening for trisomy 21 in twins using first trimester ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry in a one-stop clinic: a review of three years experience.BJOG. 2003 Mar;110(3):276-80. BJOG. 2003. PMID: 12628267
-
Multicenter study of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk-orientated two-stage first-trimester screening.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;25(3):221-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.1860. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 15736186
-
Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):45-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.090. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15295343 Review.
-
Advances in antenatal screening for Down syndrome.Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 Aug;14(4):563-80. doi: 10.1053/beog.2000.0097. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000. PMID: 10985931 Review.
Cited by
-
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening Strategies Involving Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomy 21.Front Public Health. 2022 May 31;10:870543. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.870543. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35712262 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid testing versus karyotyping in Down's syndrome screening: cost-effectiveness and detection of clinically significant chromosome abnormalities.Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Jan;19(1):3-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.138. Epub 2010 Sep 15. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011. PMID: 20842178 Free PMC article.
-
Down syndrome critical region-1 is a transcriptional target of nuclear factor of activated T cells-c1 within the endocardium during heart development.J Biol Chem. 2007 Oct 19;282(42):30673-9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703622200. Epub 2007 Aug 10. J Biol Chem. 2007. PMID: 17693409 Free PMC article.
-
Brief report: isogenic induced pluripotent stem cell lines from an adult with mosaic down syndrome model accelerated neuronal ageing and neurodegeneration.Stem Cells. 2015 Jun;33(6):2077-84. doi: 10.1002/stem.1968. Stem Cells. 2015. PMID: 25694335 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the basis for Down syndrome phenotypes.PLoS Genet. 2006 Mar;2(3):e50. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020050. PLoS Genet. 2006. PMID: 16596169 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
