Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate as empirical antifungal therapy for persistent fever in neutropenic patients with cancer who are receiving broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy. A randomized, controlled trial
- PMID: 11560454
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-6-200109180-00010
Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate as empirical antifungal therapy for persistent fever in neutropenic patients with cancer who are receiving broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy. A randomized, controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Amphotericin B deoxycholate is currently the standard empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer who have persistent fever that does not respond to antibiotic therapy. However, this treatment often causes infusion-related and metabolic toxicities, which may be dose limiting.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of itraconazole with those of amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy.
Design: An open randomized, controlled, multicenter trial, powered for equivalence.
Setting: 60 oncology centers in 10 countries.
Patients: 384 neutropenic patients with cancer who had persistent fever that did not respond to antibiotic therapy.
Intervention: Intravenous amphotericin B or intravenous itraconazole followed by oral itraconazole solution.
Measurements: Defervescence, breakthrough fungal infection, drug-related adverse events, and death.
Results: For itraconazole and amphotericin B, the median duration of therapy was 8.5 and 7 days and the median time to defervescence was 7 and 6 days, respectively. The intention-to-treat efficacy analysis of data from 360 patients showed response rates of 47% and 38% for itraconazole and amphotericin B, respectively (difference, 9.0 percentage points [95% CI, -0.8 to 19.5 percentage points]). Fewer drug-related adverse events occurred in the itraconazole group than the amphotericin B group (5% vs. 54% of patients; P = 0.001), and the rate of withdrawal because of toxicity was significantly lower with itraconazole (19% vs. 38%; P = 0.001). Significantly more amphotericin B recipients had nephrotoxicity (P < 0.001). Breakthrough fungal infections (5 patients in each group) and mortality rates (19 deaths in the itraconazole group and 25 deaths in the amphotericin B group) were similar. Sixty-five patients switched to oral itraconazole solution after receiving the intravenous formulation for a median of 9 days.
Conclusions: Itraconazole and amphotericin B have at least equivalent efficacy as empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer. However, itraconazole is associated with significantly less toxicity.
Comment in
-
Itraconazole was as effective as amphotericin B for fever and neutropenia in cancer and led to fewer adverse events.ACP J Club. 2002 Mar-Apr;136(2):58. ACP J Club. 2002. PMID: 11874283 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Intravenous itraconazole vs. amphotericin B deoxycholate for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent neutropenic fever.Korean J Intern Med. 2006 Sep;21(3):165-72. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2006.21.3.165. Korean J Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 17017665 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Summaries for patients. Itraconazole and amphotericin B to treat fungal infections in patients with cancer who are receiving chemotherapy.Ann Intern Med. 2001 Sep 18;135(6):S-39. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-6-200109180-00005. Ann Intern Med. 2001. PMID: 11575279 No abstract available.
-
Empirical versus preemptive antifungal therapy for high-risk, febrile, neutropenic patients: a randomized, controlled trial.Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Apr 15;48(8):1042-51. doi: 10.1086/597395. Clin Infect Dis. 2009. PMID: 19281327 Clinical Trial.
-
Liposomal amphotericin B: a review of its use as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia and in the treatment of invasive fungal infections.Drugs. 2009;69(3):361-92. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010. Drugs. 2009. PMID: 19275278 Review.
-
A brief review of antifungal therapy for deep fungal infection.Oncology (Williston Park). 2001 Nov;15(11 Suppl 9):21-5. Oncology (Williston Park). 2001. PMID: 11757847 Review.
Cited by
-
Intravenous itraconazole vs. amphotericin B deoxycholate for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent neutropenic fever.Korean J Intern Med. 2006 Sep;21(3):165-72. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2006.21.3.165. Korean J Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 17017665 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Current and future therapeutic options in the management of invasive aspergillosis.Drugs. 2008;68(3):265-82. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868030-00002. Drugs. 2008. PMID: 18257606 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing two approaches for empirical antifungal therapy in hematological patients with persistent febrile neutropenia.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Oct;57(10):4664-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00723-13. Epub 2013 Jul 15. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013. PMID: 23856767 Free PMC article.
-
A cost-effectiveness analysis of caspofungin vs. liposomal amphotericin B for treatment of suspected fungal infections in the UK.Eur J Haematol. 2007 Jun;78(6):532-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2007.00850.x. Epub 2007 Apr 5. Eur J Haematol. 2007. PMID: 17419744 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Success rate and risk factors for failure of empirical antifungal therapy with itraconazole in patients with hematological malignancies: a multicenter, prospective, open-label, observational study in Korea.J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Jan;29(1):61-8. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.1.61. Epub 2013 Dec 26. J Korean Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 24431907 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical