Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Sep;159(1):267-77.
doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.1.267.

The quantitative genetics of maximal and basal rates of oxygen consumption in mice

Affiliations

The quantitative genetics of maximal and basal rates of oxygen consumption in mice

M R Dohm et al. Genetics. 2001 Sep.

Abstract

A positive genetic correlation between basal metabolic rate (BMR) and maximal (VO(2)max) rate of oxygen consumption is a key assumption of the aerobic capacity model for the evolution of endothermy. We estimated the genetic (V(A), additive, and V(D), dominance), prenatal (V(N)), and postnatal common environmental (V(C)) contributions to individual differences in metabolic rates and body mass for a genetically heterogeneous laboratory strain of house mice (Mus domesticus). Our breeding design did not allow the simultaneous estimation of V(D) and V(N). Regardless of whether V(D) or V(N) was assumed, estimates of V(A) were negative under the full models. Hence, we fitted reduced models (e.g., V(A) + V(N) + V(E) or V(A) + V(E)) and obtained new variance estimates. For reduced models, narrow-sense heritability (h(2)(N)) for BMR was <0.1, but estimates of h(2)(N) for VO(2)max were higher. When estimated with the V(A) + V(E) model, the additive genetic covariance between VO(2)max and BMR was positive and statistically different from zero. This result offers tentative support for the aerobic capacity model for the evolution of vertebrate energetics. However, constraints imposed on the genetic model may cause our estimates of additive variance and covariance to be biased, so our results should be interpreted with caution and tested via selection experiments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Annu Rev Physiol. 1996;58:21-50 - PubMed
    1. J Anim Sci. 1993 Jan;71(1):57-65 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1990 Nov;259(5 Pt 2):R986-92 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1979 Nov 9;206(4419):649-54 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Sep;81(17):5484-8 - PubMed

Publication types