Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Aug;48(2):134-40.
doi: 10.1007/s002800100280.

Bioequivalence investigation of high-dose etoposide and etoposide phosphate in lymphoma patients

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Bioequivalence investigation of high-dose etoposide and etoposide phosphate in lymphoma patients

S Reif et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2001 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare etoposide pharmacokinetics following administration of high-dose etoposide and etoposide phosphate, a water-soluble prodrug of etoposide. Bioequivalence was assessed using a two-treatment randomized crossover design.

Methods: Ten patients with high-risk or relapsed lymphoma were treated with a sequential high-dose chemotherapy. They were randomized to receive either 3 x 400 mg/m2 etoposide or an equimolar amount of etoposide phosphate (as 1-h infusions on three consecutive days) in the first course and the alternative drug in the second course. Serial plasma and ultrafiltered plasma samples were collected and analysed for etoposide by a reversed-phase HPLC method with UV and electrochemical detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a two-compartment model. Bioequivalence was assessed calculating the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratios of the geometric means of AUC(0-infinity) and additionally of Cmax of etoposide derived from etoposide phosphate relative to etoposide in plasma and ultrafiltered plasma as point estimates (level of significance alpha < 0.05).

Results: Pharmacokinetic parameters of etoposide were comparable in both treatment arms except that terminal half-life was significantly shorter and apparent Vss in ultrafiltered plasma was significantly larger following administration of the prodrug. The point estimates for AUC(0-infinity) of etoposide derived from etoposide phosphate relative to etoposide were 102.9% and 88.4% for plasma and ultrafiltered plasma, respectively. The 90% CIs were in the range from 80% to 125% where bioequivalence can be assumed. The point estimates of Cmax on day 3 of chemotherapy were 96.5% and 81.7% in plasma and ultrafiltrate with the 90% CI in ultrafiltered plasma being out of the range from 80% to 125%.

Conclusion: With respect to total drug exposure, represented by AUC(0-infinity), high-dose etoposide phosphate is bioequivalent to high-dose etoposide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources