Testing cognitive models of visual attention with fMRI and MEG
- PMID: 11566315
- DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00121-x
Testing cognitive models of visual attention with fMRI and MEG
Abstract
Neuroimaging techniques can be used not only to identify the neural substrates of attention, but also to test cognitive theories of attention. Here we consider four classic questions in the psychology of visual attention: (i) Are some 'special' classes of stimuli (e.g. faces) immune to attentional modulation?; (ii) What are the information units on which attention operates?; (iii) How early in stimulus processing are attentional effects observed?; and (iv) Are common mechanisms involved in different modes of attentional selection (e.g. spatial and non-spatial selection)? We describe studies from our laboratory that illustrate the ways in which fMRI and MEG can provide key evidence in answering these questions. A central methodological theme in many of our fMRI studies is the use of analyses in which the activity in certain functionally-defined regions of interest (ROIs) is used to test specific cognitive hypotheses. An analogous sensor-of-interest (SOI) approach is applied to MEG. Our results include: evidence for the modulation of face representations by attention; confirmation of the independent contributions of object-based and location-based selection; evidence for modulation of face representations by non-spatial selection within the first 170 ms of processing; and implication of the intraparietal sulcus in functions general to spatial and non-spatial visual selection.
Similar articles
-
Neurobiological measures of human selective attention.Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(12):1257-62. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00115-4. Neuropsychologia. 2001. PMID: 11566309 Review.
-
Dissociating top-down attentional control from selective perception and action.Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(12):1277-91. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00117-8. Neuropsychologia. 2001. PMID: 11566311 Review.
-
Spatiotemporal dynamics of early spatial and category-specific attentional modulations.Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 15;60(3):1638-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.121. Epub 2012 Feb 3. Neuroimage. 2012. PMID: 22342803
-
Temporal dynamics of face selection mechanism in the context of similar and dissimilar faces: ERP evidence for biased competition within the ventral occipito-temporal cortex using ICA.Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):682-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.018. Epub 2011 Jul 19. Neuroimage. 2012. PMID: 21782957
-
Attention inhibition of early cortical activation to fearful faces.Brain Res. 2010 Feb 8;1313:113-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.060. Epub 2009 Dec 11. Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20004181
Cited by
-
The automaticity of face perception is influenced by familiarity.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Oct;79(7):2202-2211. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1362-1. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017. PMID: 28681181 Free PMC article.
-
Perception and action selection dissociate human ventral and dorsal cortex.J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jun;23(6):1494-506. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21499. Epub 2010 May 13. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 20465356 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Individual differences in multiple types of shifting attention.Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1730-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03195934. Mem Cognit. 2006. PMID: 17489298
-
Face Processing is Gated by Visual Spatial Attention.Front Hum Neurosci. 2008 Mar 28;1:10. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.010.2007. eCollection 2007. Front Hum Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 18958224 Free PMC article.
-
Spectral Encoding of Seen and Attended Object Categories in the Human Brain.J Neurosci. 2020 Jan 8;40(2):327-342. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0900-19.2019. Epub 2019 Nov 6. J Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 31694964 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical