Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Sep 22;323(7314):658-61.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7314.658.

Is voice therapy an effective treatment for dysphonia? A randomised controlled trial

K MacKenzie  1 , A Millar, J A Wilson, C Sellars, I J Deary
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Is voice therapy an effective treatment for dysphonia? A randomised controlled trial

K MacKenzie et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the overall efficacy of voice therapy for dysphonia.

Design: Single blind randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Outpatient clinic in a teaching hospital.

Participants: 204 outpatients aged 17-87 with a primary symptom of persistent hoarseness for at least two months.

Interventions: After baseline assessments, patients were randomised to six weeks of either voice therapy or no treatment. Assessments were repeated at six weeks on the 145 (71%) patients who continued to this stage and at 12-14 weeks on the 133 (65%) patients who completed the study. The assessments at the three time points for the 70 patients who completed treatment and the 63 patients in the group given no treatment were compared.

Main outcome measures: Ratings of laryngeal features, Buffalo voice profile, amplitude and pitch perturbation, voice profile questionnaire, hospital anxiety and depression scale, clinical interview schedule, SF-36.

Results: Voice therapy improved voice quality as assessed by rating by patients (P=0.001) and rating by observer (P<0.001). The treatment effects for these two outcomes were 4.1 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 6.6) points and 0.82 (0.50 to 1.13) points. Amplitude perturbation showed improvement at six weeks (P=0.005) but not on completion of the study. Patients with dysphonia had appreciable psychological distress and lower quality of life than controls, but voice therapy had no significant impact on either of these variables.

Conclusion: Voice therapy is effective in improving voice quality as assessed by self rated and observer rated methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Flow chart of study
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Wilson JA, Deary IJ, Scott S, MacKenzie K. Functional dysphonia [editorial] BMJ. 1995;311:1039–1040. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scott S, Wilson JA, Robinson K, MacKenzie K. Patient reported problems associated with dysphonia. Clin Otolaryngol. 1997;22:37–40. - PubMed
    1. Aronson A, Peterson H, Litin E. Psychiatric symptomology in functional dysphonia and aphonia. J Speech Hear Disord. 1996;31:115–127. - PubMed
    1. Matas M. Psychogenic voice disorders: literature review and case report. Can J Psychiatry. 1991;36:363–365. - PubMed
    1. Gerritsma EJ. An investigation into some personality characteristics of patients with psychogenic aphonia and dysphonia. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1991;43:13–20. - PubMed

Publication types