Solitary blood cultures: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 132,778 blood culture sets in 333 small hospitals
- PMID: 11570903
- DOI: 10.5858/2001-125-1290-SBC
Solitary blood cultures: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 132,778 blood culture sets in 333 small hospitals
Abstract
Objective: To determine the frequency with which solitary blood culture samples were submitted to laboratories serving small hospitals and to ascertain whether certain hospital practices relating to the performance of blood cultures were associated with lower solitary blood culture rates (SBCRs).
Design: Participants in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes laboratory quality improvement program collected data prospectively on the numbers of solitary blood culture sets from adult patients submitted to their laboratories and answered questions about their institutions' practice characteristics relating to the collection of blood culture specimens.
Setting and participants: Three hundred thirty-three public and private institutions with a median occupied bed size of 57. Participants were located in the United States (n = 329), Canada (n = 3), and Australia (n = 1).
Main outcome measure: The solitary blood culture rate was defined as the number of instances in which only 1 blood culture venipuncture was performed on an individual patient during a 24-hour period divided by the total number of blood culture venipunctures that were performed during the study period.
Results: Participants submitted data on 132 778 adult patient blood culture sets. The SBCRs were 3.4% or less in the top-performing 10% of participating institutions (90th percentile and above), 12.7% in the midrange of participating institutions (50th percentile), and 42.5% or more in the bottom-performing 10% of participating institutions (10th percentile and below). In half the participating institutions, the SBCRs for inpatients were 8.3% or less and for outpatients, 22% or less. Solitary blood culture rates were lower for institutions in which phlebotomists rather than nonphlebotomists routinely collected blood culture specimens, in which internal policies required drawing at least 2 blood culture sets, in which hospital personnel contacted clinicians when their laboratories received requests for solitary blood culture sets, and in which quality control programs monitored SBCRs routinely.
Conclusions: Hospitals can achieve SBCRs under 5%. Those hospitals with particularly high SBCRs may lower their rates by altering certain institutional practices.
Similar articles
-
Quality indicators of blood utilization: three College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of 12,288,404 red blood cell units in 1639 hospitals.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002 Feb;126(2):150-6. doi: 10.5858/2002-126-0150-QIOBU. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002. PMID: 11825109
-
Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Jun;122(6):495-502. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998. PMID: 9625416
-
Q-tracks: a College of American Pathologists program of continuous laboratory monitoring and longitudinal tracking.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002 Sep;126(9):1036-44. doi: 10.5858/2002-126-1036-QT. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002. PMID: 12204052
-
Laboratory productivity and the rate of manual peripheral blood smear review: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 95,141 complete blood count determinations performed in 263 institutions.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 May;130(5):596-601. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-596-LPATRO. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006. PMID: 16683868
-
Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years' experience with the College of American Pathologists' Q-PROBES and Q-TRACKS programs.Clin Lab Med. 2004 Dec;24(4):965-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2004.09.001. Clin Lab Med. 2004. PMID: 15555751 Review.
Cited by
-
How to Optimize the Use of Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? A State-of-the Art.Front Microbiol. 2016 May 12;7:697. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00697. eCollection 2016. Front Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 27242721 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Blood Culture Utilization in the Hospital Setting: a Call for Diagnostic Stewardship.J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Mar 16;60(3):e0100521. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01005-21. Epub 2021 Jul 14. J Clin Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 34260274 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Blood Culture Use in Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Units and Wards.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454738. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54738. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 39813030 Free PMC article.
-
Blood culture quality and turnaround time of clinical microbiology laboratories in Chinese Teaching Hospitals: A multicenter study.J Clin Lab Anal. 2024 Jan;38(1-2):e25008. doi: 10.1002/jcla.25008. Epub 2024 Jan 18. J Clin Lab Anal. 2024. PMID: 38235610 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-specific risk factors contributing to blood culture contamination.Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 18;2(1):e46. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.22. eCollection 2022. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 36310794 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical