Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11662-7.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.201392698.

Initial recovery of vision after early monocular deprivation in kittens is faster when both eyes are open

Affiliations

Initial recovery of vision after early monocular deprivation in kittens is faster when both eyes are open

D E Mitchell et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

A comparison was made of the speed of visual recovery in the deprived eye of kittens after a 6-day period of monocular deprivation imposed at 5-9 weeks of age in two postdeprivation conditions. In one condition, binocular recovery (BR), both eyes were open, whereas in the other condition, reverse lid-suture (RLS), the formerly nondeprived eye was closed to force the animal to use the originally deprived eye. In littermate pairs, BR kittens began to recover form vision 12 to 30 h before those subjected to RLS. The vision of the deprived eye of the BR animals remained superior to that of their RLS littermates for 4-8 days. Although this finding is difficult to reconcile with competitive mechanisms of synaptic plasticity, it supports a prediction of an alternative model of synaptic plasticity [Bienenstock, E. L., Cooper, L. N. & Munro, P. W. (1982) J. Neurosci. 2, 32-48] for slower initial recovery with RLS because of the time required to reset the modification threshold.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) A sketch (not to scale) of the jumping stand used to measure visual acuity. Kittens were trained to jump from a platform (P) to a vertical grating that was separated by a divider from an adjacent horizontal grating of the same period. See text for details. (B) The MAR of the deprived eye of C844B (○) and C842R (●) as a function of recovery time. The lines through the data represent the best-fitting power functions to the MAR values excluding all data obtained following attainment of the lowest MAR value after approximately 10 days.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The MAR of the deprived eye as a function of recovery time for three other littermate comparisons of BR (○) and RLS (●).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) The BCM model. The synaptic weight of a particular synapse changes in time as a linear function of the presynaptic activity and a nonlinear function (φ), of the postsynaptic activity (c) and the modification threshold (θm) that is a function of the time-averaged postsynaptic activity of the cell. According to the BCM model, synaptic strengthening of a synapse occurs when presynaptic activity is sufficient to cause depolarization of the postsynaptic cell above the modification threshold, whereas levels of depolarization below this threshold leads to synaptic weakening. See Methods for further details. (B) The predicted changes with time in the synaptic weights (ML) with the deprived (left) eye for the two recovery conditions. CL and CR represent the level of postsynaptic activity attributable to stimulation of, respectively, either the left (deprived) or right eye. In the situation of BR, CL+R represents the postsynaptic activity resulting from simultaneous stimulation of both eyes. For the RLS condition, the original modification threshold at time t0 is designated as θm0, whereas θm1 and θm2 refer to its level at t1 and t2, respectively. The φ function for the RLS condition is indicated at three points in time by the filled line; the dashed line depicts this function at time t0. Data from our experiments suggest that resetting of the modification threshold requires 12–30 h depending on the state of developmental plasticity (i.e., the age of the kitten when monocularly deprived).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wiesel T N, Hubel D H. J Neurophysiol. 1965;28:1029–1040. - PubMed
    1. Guillery R W. In: The Making of the Nervous System. Parnevelas J G, Stern C J, Sterling RV, editors. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press; 1988. pp. 356–379.
    1. Hubel D H, Wiesel T N, LeVay S. Philos Trans R Soc London B. 1977;278:377–409. - PubMed
    1. Miller K D, Keller J B, Stryker M P. Science. 1989;245:605–615. - PubMed
    1. Mitchell D E, Cynader M, Movshon J A. J Comp Neurol. 1977;176:53–64. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources