Effect of different mouthrinses on morning breath
- PMID: 11577950
- DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.72.9.1183
Effect of different mouthrinses on morning breath
Abstract
Background: Morning breath odor is an often-encountered complaint. This double-blind, crossover, randomized study aimed to examine the bad breath-inhibiting effect of 3 commercially available mouthrinses on morning halitosis during an experimental period of 12 days without mechanical plaque control.
Methods: Twelve medical students with a healthy periodontium refrained from all means of mechanical plaque control during 3 experimental periods of 12 days (with intervening washout periods of at least 3 weeks). A professional oral cleaning preceded each period. During each experimental period, as the only oral hygiene measure allowed, the students rinsed twice a day with one of the following formulations in a randomized order: CHX-Alc (a 0.2% chlorhexidine [CHX] solution); CHX-NaF (CHX 0.12% plus sodium fluoride 0.05%); or CHX-CPC-Zn (CHX 0.05% plus cetylpyridinium chloride 0.05% plus zinc lactate 0.14%). After 12 days, morning breath was scored via volatile sulfur compound (VSC) level measurements of the mouth air and organoleptic ratings of the mouth air, the expired air, and a scraping of the tongue coating. At the 12-day visit, a questionnaire (subjective ratings) was completed and samples taken from both the tongue coating and the saliva for anaerobic and aerobic culturing and vitality staining. The de novo supragingival plaque formation was also recorded. All parameters were correlated with the baseline registrations.
Results: Although oral hygiene during the 3 experimental periods was limited to oral rinses, bad breath parameters systematically improved, with the exception of a slight increase in VSC levels while using CHX-Alc, a finding which was associated with the direct influence of the CHX on the sulfide monitor. The oral microbial load after the use of CHX-NaF remained unchanged, while for the CHX-Alc and CHX-CPC-Zn, significant reductions in both aerobic and anaerobic colony forming units (CFU)/ml were noticed in comparison with baseline data for both tongue coating and saliva samples. The composition of microflora, on the other hand, did not reveal significant changes. The supragingival plaque formation was inhibited, in descending order, by CHX-Alc, CHX-CPC-Zn, and CHX-NaF. The subjective scores for the rinses indicated a higher appreciation for CHX-CPC-Alc and CHX-NaF because of a better taste and fewer side effects.
Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that morning halitosis can be successfully reduced via daily use of mouthrinses. CHX-Alc and CHX-CPC-Zn mouthrinses result in a significant reduction of the microbial load of tongue and saliva.
Similar articles
-
Biofilms and the tongue: therapeutical approaches for the control of halitosis.Clin Oral Investig. 2003 Dec;7(4):189-97. doi: 10.1007/s00784-003-0214-7. Epub 2003 Sep 26. Clin Oral Investig. 2003. PMID: 14513303 Review.
-
The efficacy of amine fluoride/stannous fluoride in the suppression of morning breath odour.J Clin Periodontol. 2002 Oct;29(10):944-54. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.291010.x. J Clin Periodontol. 2002. PMID: 12445227 Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of periodontal therapy and the adjunctive effect of antiseptics on breath odor-related outcome variables: a double-blind randomized study.J Periodontol. 2005 May;76(5):705-12. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.5.705. J Periodontol. 2005. PMID: 15898930 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative effects of different chlorhexidine mouth-rinse formulations on volatile sulphur compounds and salivary bacterial counts.J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Dec;31(12):1128-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00621.x. J Clin Periodontol. 2004. PMID: 15560817 Clinical Trial.
-
[Delmopinol--an alternative to chlorhexidine?].Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2003;113(2):136-42. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2003. PMID: 12680413 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Correlations between Perceived Oral Malodor Levels and Self-Reported Oral Complaints.Int J Dent. 2015;2015:343527. doi: 10.1155/2015/343527. Epub 2015 Jul 27. Int J Dent. 2015. PMID: 26273303 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of antioxidant mouthwash in the reduction of halitosis: A randomized, double blind, controlled crossover clinical trial.J Dent Sci. 2021 Mar;16(2):621-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Oct 23. J Dent Sci. 2021. PMID: 33854711 Free PMC article.
-
Biofilms and the tongue: therapeutical approaches for the control of halitosis.Clin Oral Investig. 2003 Dec;7(4):189-97. doi: 10.1007/s00784-003-0214-7. Epub 2003 Sep 26. Clin Oral Investig. 2003. PMID: 14513303 Review.
-
A randomized double blind crossover placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the effects of a mouthwash containing chlorine dioxide on oral malodor.Trials. 2008 Dec 9;9:71. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-71. Trials. 2008. PMID: 19068114 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for managing halitosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 11;12(12):CD012213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012213.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31825092 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials