Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 Oct;35(5):297-302.
doi: 10.1136/bjsm.35.5.297.

Computerised cognitive assessment of athletes with sports related head injury

Affiliations
Review

Computerised cognitive assessment of athletes with sports related head injury

A Collie et al. Br J Sports Med. 2001 Oct.

Abstract

Professional and amateur participants in many sports are at risk of brain injury caused by impact with other players or objects. In many cases, mild cognitive deficits may persist after the common neurological signs of brain injury have passed. In recent years, the athlete's cognitive status after concussion has been measured with conventional "paper and pencil" neuropsychological tests. However, such tests are not ideal for sporting settings, as they are designed for the detection of gross cognitive impairments at a single assessment, not for the identification of mild cognitive deficits on repeated assessment. A number of computerised cognitive assessment tests and test batteries have been developed over the past two decades. These batteries offer major scientific and practical advantages over conventional neuropsychological tests which make them ideal for the assessment of cognitive function in sportspeople. This review first describes the problems associated with cognitive assessment of people with sports related cognitive deficits, and then critically examines the utility of conventional neuropsychological and computerised cognitive tests in sporting settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Feb;49(2):110-7 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1999 Feb;21(1):70-86 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1975 Nov 22;2(7943):995-7 - PubMed
    1. Neurosurgery. 1988 May;22(5):853-8 - PubMed
    1. Brain. 1988 Jun;111 ( Pt 3):695-718 - PubMed