Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Oct 1;194(7):1003-12.
doi: 10.1084/jem.194.7.1003.

Notch 1-deficient common lymphoid precursors adopt a B cell fate in the thymus

Affiliations

Notch 1-deficient common lymphoid precursors adopt a B cell fate in the thymus

A Wilson et al. J Exp Med. .

Abstract

We have recently reported that Notch 1, a member of the Notch multigene family, is essential for the development of murine T cells. Using a mouse model in which Notch 1 is inactivated in bone marrow (BM) precursors we have shown that B cells instead of T cells are found in the thymus of BM chimeras. However, it is not clear whether these B cells develop by default from a common lymphoid precursor due to the absence of Notch 1 signaling, or whether they arise as a result of perturbed migration of BM-derived B cells and/or altered homeostasis of normal resident thymic B cells. In this report we show that Notch 1-deficient thymic B cells resemble BM B cells in phenotype and turnover kinetics and are located predominantly in the medulla and corticomedullary junction. Peripheral blood lymphocyte analysis shows no evidence of recirculating Notch1(-/)- BM B cells. Furthermore, lack of T cell development is not due to a failure of Notch1(-/)- precursors to home to the thymus, as even after intrathymic reconstitution with BM cells, B cells instead of T cells develop from Notch 1-deficient precursors. Taken together, these results provide evidence for de novo ectopic B cell development in the thymus, and support the hypothesis that in the absence of Notch 1 common lymphoid precursors adopt the default cell fate and develop into B cells instead.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kinetics of emergence of immature B cells in the adult thymus after Notch 1 deletion. (A) Total thymocyte numbers (×106) and the CD4 versus CD8 profiles (top row) of adult thymi from control (left panel), Notch 1 deleted at 7, 14, 21, and 28 d (respectively) after pIpC injection (middle panels), compared with the profile obtained from CD45.2+ cells derived from Notch 1–deficient BM in the mixed BM chimera system (right panel) after 3 mo. The relative percentage of DN thymocytes is shown for each time point as well as the CD19 versus B220 FACS® analysis on gated DNs (bottom row). Contour plots are representative examples of individual mice. Data are mean ± SD from 8–12 mice for each time point. (B) Expression of B220 versus IgM or CD43 on total BM and thymus from Notch 1–deficient mice 28 d after deletion. (C) Expression of B cell markers, IgM, IgD, Sca-1, AA4.1, BP-1, and CD25 on gated LN, BM, or thymic B cells (gated on B220+CD19+) in CD45.2+ Notch 1–deficient BM-derived cells from mixed BM chimeras compared with Notch 1–deficient thymic B cells in the adult deletion model.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Kinetics of emergence of immature B cells in the adult thymus after Notch 1 deletion. (A) Total thymocyte numbers (×106) and the CD4 versus CD8 profiles (top row) of adult thymi from control (left panel), Notch 1 deleted at 7, 14, 21, and 28 d (respectively) after pIpC injection (middle panels), compared with the profile obtained from CD45.2+ cells derived from Notch 1–deficient BM in the mixed BM chimera system (right panel) after 3 mo. The relative percentage of DN thymocytes is shown for each time point as well as the CD19 versus B220 FACS® analysis on gated DNs (bottom row). Contour plots are representative examples of individual mice. Data are mean ± SD from 8–12 mice for each time point. (B) Expression of B220 versus IgM or CD43 on total BM and thymus from Notch 1–deficient mice 28 d after deletion. (C) Expression of B cell markers, IgM, IgD, Sca-1, AA4.1, BP-1, and CD25 on gated LN, BM, or thymic B cells (gated on B220+CD19+) in CD45.2+ Notch 1–deficient BM-derived cells from mixed BM chimeras compared with Notch 1–deficient thymic B cells in the adult deletion model.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Kinetics of emergence of immature B cells in the adult thymus after Notch 1 deletion. (A) Total thymocyte numbers (×106) and the CD4 versus CD8 profiles (top row) of adult thymi from control (left panel), Notch 1 deleted at 7, 14, 21, and 28 d (respectively) after pIpC injection (middle panels), compared with the profile obtained from CD45.2+ cells derived from Notch 1–deficient BM in the mixed BM chimera system (right panel) after 3 mo. The relative percentage of DN thymocytes is shown for each time point as well as the CD19 versus B220 FACS® analysis on gated DNs (bottom row). Contour plots are representative examples of individual mice. Data are mean ± SD from 8–12 mice for each time point. (B) Expression of B220 versus IgM or CD43 on total BM and thymus from Notch 1–deficient mice 28 d after deletion. (C) Expression of B cell markers, IgM, IgD, Sca-1, AA4.1, BP-1, and CD25 on gated LN, BM, or thymic B cells (gated on B220+CD19+) in CD45.2+ Notch 1–deficient BM-derived cells from mixed BM chimeras compared with Notch 1–deficient thymic B cells in the adult deletion model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Concomitant increase in thymic B cells and decrease in DN 1, 2, or 3 immature thymocytes in adult Notch 1–deleted mice. Total numbers of thymic B cells or DN 1 (lineage negative, CD117+44+25), DN 2 (CD117+44+25+), and DN 3 (CD1174425+) thymocytes from Notch 1 adult deleted mice (at various times after deletion) were normalized to the equivalent subset from pIpC-treated control mice which was taken as 100%. Data are mean values of 8–12 mice per time point.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mature phenotype of circulating B cells in Notch1−/− mice. (A) Expression of B220 versus IgM on PBLs isolated from pIpC-treated control or Notch 1–deficient mice on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 after deletion. (B) Expression of IgM, IgD, class II, AA4.1, BP-1, and CD43 on gated B220+CD19+ B cells isolated from PBLs from control (dotted line) compared with Notch 1 deleted (solid line) 21 d after deletion. Data for each part of Fig. 3 are representative FACS® profiles from experiments in which six mice of each genotype were analyzed at each time point.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mature phenotype of circulating B cells in Notch1−/− mice. (A) Expression of B220 versus IgM on PBLs isolated from pIpC-treated control or Notch 1–deficient mice on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 after deletion. (B) Expression of IgM, IgD, class II, AA4.1, BP-1, and CD43 on gated B220+CD19+ B cells isolated from PBLs from control (dotted line) compared with Notch 1 deleted (solid line) 21 d after deletion. Data for each part of Fig. 3 are representative FACS® profiles from experiments in which six mice of each genotype were analyzed at each time point.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Notch1−/− BM cells give rise to B cells upon intrathymic injection. (A) Expression of CD45.2 (donor derived) versus CD45.1 (host derived) in the thymus 21 d after intrathymic injection of control (top panel) or Notch 1–deficient (bottom panel) BM. Contour plots contain around 500,000 events. (B) Expression of CD4 versus CD8 in CD45.2+ (donor derived) thymocytes 21 d after intrathymic injection of control (top) or Notch 1–deleted (bottom) BM. Contour plots contain around 10,000 and 5,000 events, respectively. (C) Expression of B220, CD19, and AA4.1 on CD45.2+CD4CD8 (donor derived) thymocytes 21 d after intrathymic injection of Notch 1–deleted BM. Data for all parts of Fig. 5 are representative stainings from three independent experiments.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Rapid turnover of Notch1−/− thymic B cells. Percentage of BrdU+ B cells (gated as B220+CD19+) from thymus, PBLs, spleen, and BM isolated from control (right panel) or Notch 1–deleted (14 d after deletion, left panel) mice after 12, 24, or 48 h continuous labeling. Data are mean ± SD of 4–8 mice per time point.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of thymic B cells in Notch1−/− versus other T cell–deficient mouse models. Number and phenotype of thymic B cells in (A) control, (B) day 28 adult Notch 1 deleted, (C) CD3ε26tg, and (D) TCRβ-deficient mice. CD19 versus B220 profiles on total thymus (left panels), expression of IgM (middle panels), and BP-1 versus AA4.1 (right panels) on gated B220+ B cells. The numbers are mean ± SD of total B cells (×106) per thymus from 7–10 mice of each genotype.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Tissue localization of intrathymic Notch1−/− B cells in mixed BM chimeras. Expression of CD45.2 (top two panels) and B220 (bottom panel) on serial sections of thymi reconstituted with control (top panel) or Notch 1 deleted (bottom panels) BM precursors.

Comment in

  • Coming to grips with Notch.
    von Boehmer H. von Boehmer H. J Exp Med. 2001 Oct 1;194(7):F43-6. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.7.f43. J Exp Med. 2001. PMID: 11581323 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Artavanis-Tsakonas S., Rand M.D., Lake R.J. Notch signalingcell fate control and signal integration in development. Science. 1999;284:770–776. - PubMed
    1. Artavanis-Tsakonas S., Matsuno K., Fortini M.E. Notch signaling. Science. 1995;268:225–232. - PubMed
    1. Shutter J.R., Scully S., Fan W., Richards W.G., Kitajewski J., Deblandre G.A., Kintner C.R., Stark K.L. Dll4, a novel Notch ligand expressed in arterial endothelium. Genes Dev. 2000;14:1313–1318. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osborne B., Miele L. Notch and the immune system. Immunity. 1999;11:653–663. - PubMed
    1. Robey E. Regulation of T cell fate by Notch. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1999;17:283–295. - PubMed

Publication types