Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI)
- PMID: 11583246
- DOI: 10.1111/1469-7610.00770
Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI)
Abstract
In this study 160 children, aged 11 years with a definite history of specific language impairment (SLI), completed four tasks that could be potential positive psycholinguistic markers for this impairment: a third person singular task, a past tense task, a nonword repetition task, and a sentence repetition task. This allowed examination of more than one type of marker simultaneously, facilitating both comparisons between markers and also evaluation of combinations of markers in relation to identifying SLI. The study also provided data regarding the markers in relation to nonverbal IQ, made use of new normative data on all tasks, and examined marker accuracy in relation to current language status. The results show that markers vary in accuracy, with sentence repetition (a previously unused marker) proving to be the most useful. This psycholinguistic marker shows high levels of sensitivity (90%), specificity (85%), and overall accuracy (88%), as well as being able to identify the majority of children whose current language status falls in the normal range despite a history of SLI.
Similar articles
-
Processing and linguistic markers in young children with specific language impairment (SLI).J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Oct;46(5):1029-37. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/082). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003. PMID: 14575341
-
Autism, primary pragmatic difficulties, and specific language impairment: can we distinguish them using psycholinguistic markers?Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003 Aug;45(8):515-24. doi: 10.1017/s0012162203000963. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003. PMID: 12882530
-
On the sensitivity and specificity of nonword repetition and sentence recall to language and memory impairments in children.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Aug;52(4):899-914. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0099). Epub 2009 Apr 29. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009. PMID: 19403945
-
Evaluation of three proposed markers for language impairment in English: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Dec;57(6):2261-73. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0189. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014. PMID: 25198731 Review.
-
Is specific language impairment a valid diagnostic category? Genetic and psycholinguistic evidence.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Oct 29;346(1315):105-11. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0134. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994. PMID: 7886145 Review.
Cited by
-
Improving working memory in children with low language abilities.Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 30;6:519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00519. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 25983703 Free PMC article.
-
Phonological characteristics of novel gesture production in children with developmental language disorder: Longitudinal findings.Appl Psycholinguist. 2022 Mar;43(2):333-362. doi: 10.1017/s0142716421000540. Epub 2021 Dec 15. Appl Psycholinguist. 2022. PMID: 35342208 Free PMC article.
-
The discriminant accuracy of a grammatical measure with Latino English-speaking children.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Aug;50(4):968-81. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/068). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007. PMID: 17675599 Free PMC article.
-
Communicative competence in parents of children with autism and parents of children with specific language impairment.J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Aug;37(7):1323-36. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0274-z. Epub 2006 Dec 16. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007. PMID: 17180460
-
Do Children With Developmental Language Disorder Activate Scene Knowledge to Guide Visual Attention? Effect of Object-Scene Inconsistencies on Gaze Allocation.Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 7;12:796459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796459. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35069387 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous