Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears
- PMID: 11584480
Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears
Abstract
Objective: To assess strategies using repeated conventional Pap smear and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing, alone or in combination, for identifying women with concomitant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3 (CIN 2/3) in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) in their Pap smears.
Study design: A total of 360 women cytologically diagnosed with ASCUS were referred for colposcopy and underwent a repeat Pap smear, a biopsy when necessary and HPV testing using three different modes of detection of high-oncogenic-risk HPV types: 1, first-generation Hybrid Capture test (HC-1) (Digene Diagnostics, Gaithersburg, Maryland); 2, second-generation Hybrid Capture test (HC-2); and 3, polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Results: Nineteen patients (5.3%) had histologic CIN 2/3. The sensitivity and specificity of the repeat Pap smear alone for the detection of CIN 2/3 were 73.7% and 62.9%, respectively, when referring all women with a repeat Pap smear using an ASCUS-positive threshold. The proportion of women referred for colposcopy was 39.0%. When HPV testing for high risk was used for identification of women with histologic CIN 2/3, sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 68.4% and 85.9% for HC-1, 89.5% and 73.9% for HC-2 and 89.5% and 59.0% for PCR. The rate of referral for colposcopy of these three modes of HPV testing was 16.9%, 29.4% and 44.0%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for identification of women with concomitant CIN 2/3 using a combination of repeat cytology showing a low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and/or a test positive for high-oncogenic-risk HPV group were, respectively, 94.7% and 73.2% when used in combination with HC-2. The referral rate of women for colposcopy of this combined strategy was 30.4%.
Conclusion: As compared to the strategy using abnormal repeat Pap smear alone, those using high-risk HPV testing with Hybrid Capture showed statistically significantly higher specificities and lower proportions of women with ASCUS referred for colposcopy. In particular, a promising strategy would be to refer for colposcopy only women with repeat Pap smears showing squamous intraepithelial lesion and/or those positive for high-risk HPV detected by Hybrid Capture testing.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA testing and repeat Papanicolaou test in women with low-grade cervical cytologic abnormalities: a randomized trial. HPV Effectiveness in Lowgrade Paps (HELP) Study No. 1 Group.CMAJ. 2000 Sep 19;163(6):701-7. CMAJ. 2000. PMID: 11022584 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL on Pap smear reports: management by repeat Pap smear, HPV DNA testing, or colposcopy?J Fam Pract. 1998 Feb;46(2):125-34. J Fam Pract. 1998. PMID: 9487318
-
Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1749-57. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1749. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 12365959
-
The problems with different management options of women with minor squamous intraepithelial lesions in Pap tests.Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2004;31(4):249-50. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15672956 Review.
-
Human papillomavirus triage of patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on cervical Papanicolaou smear.Ann Acad Med Singap. 2003 Sep;32(5):590-5; quiz 596. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2003. PMID: 14626785 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of a real time optoelectronic device (TruScreen™) in detecting cervical intraepithelial pathologies: a prospective observational study.J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015 Mar 1;16(1):41-4. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2015.15199. eCollection 2015. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015. PMID: 25788849 Free PMC article.
-
Triage of women with equivocal or low-grade cervical cytology results: a meta-analysis of the HPV test positivity rate.J Cell Mol Med. 2009 Apr;13(4):648-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00631.x. Epub 2009 Jan 23. J Cell Mol Med. 2009. PMID: 19166485 Free PMC article.
-
Human papillomavirus infections in primary care.Clin Med Res. 2007 Dec;5(4):210-7. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2007.751. Epub 2007 Dec 17. Clin Med Res. 2007. PMID: 18086908 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevention of Cervical Cancer: Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3 Level, AWMF Register Number 015/027OL, December 2017) - Part 2 on Triage, Treatment and Follow-up.Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019 Feb;79(2):160-176. doi: 10.1055/a-0828-7722. Epub 2019 Feb 18. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019. PMID: 30792546 Free PMC article.
-
Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD008054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008054.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23543559 Free PMC article.