Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Sep-Oct;3(5):283-91, 318.
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2001.01136.x.

Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension

S Oparil et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2001 Sep-Oct.

Erratum in

  • J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2001 Nov-Dec;3(6):395

Abstract

In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, the authors compared the antihypertensive efficacy of once-daily treatment with the new angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan (20 mg) with recommended starting doses of losartan (50 mg), valsartan (80 mg), and irbesartan (150 mg) in 588 patients with a cuff diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of greater than or equal to 100 and less than or equal to 115 mm Hg and a mean daytime DBP of greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg and less than 120 mm Hg, as measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Cuff and ambulatory blood pressures were monitored at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment. All groups were predominantly white and approximately 62% male, and their mean age was approximately 52 years. In all groups, mean baseline DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were approximately 104 and 157 mm Hg, respectively. The reduction of sitting cuff DBP with olmesartan (11.5 mm Hg), the primary efficacy variable of this study, was significantly greater than with losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan (8.2, 7.9, and 9.9 mm Hg, respectively). Reductions of cuff SBP with the four ARBs ranged from 8.4-11.3 mm Hg and were not significantly different. The reduction in mean 24-hour DBP with olmesartan (8.5 mm Hg) was significantly greater than reductions with losartan and valsartan (6.2 and 5.6 mm Hg, respectively) and showed a trend toward significance when compared to the reduction in DBP with irbesartan (7.4 mm Hg; p=0.087). The reduction in mean 24-hour SBP with olmesartan (12.5 mm Hg) was significantly greater than the reductions with losartan and valsartan (9.0 and 8.1 mm Hg, respectively) and equivalent to the reduction with irbesartan (11.3 mm Hg). All drugs were well tolerated. The authors conclude that olmesartan, at its starting dose, is more effective than the starting doses of the other ARBs tested in reducing cuff DBP in patients with essential hypertension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Least squares mean change from baseline in cuff diastolic blood pressure (DBP) after 8 weeks of treatment with olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan. *p<0.05 vs. olmesartan; †p<0.0005 vs. olmesartan
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in least squares mean 24‐hour diastolic (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment with olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan. *p<0.05 vs. olmesartan

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burnier M, Brunner HR. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Lancet. 2000;355:637–645. - PubMed
    1. Yanagisawa H, Amemiya Y, Kanazaki T, et al. Nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists: synthesis, biological activities, and structure‐activity relationships of imidazole‐5‐carboxyliv acids bearing alkyl, alkenyl, and hydroxyalkyl substituents at the 4‐position and their related compounds. J Med Chem. 1996;39:323–338. - PubMed
    1. Mizuno M, Sada T, Ikeda M, et al. Pharmacology of CS‐866, a novel nonpeptide angiotensin‐II receptor antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995;285:181–188. - PubMed
    1. Schwocho LR, Masonson HN. Pharmacokinetics of CS‐866, a new angiotensin‐II receptor blocker, in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;41:515–527. - PubMed
    1. Israili ZH. Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin‐II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2000;14(suppl 1):S73–S86. - PubMed