Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension
- PMID: 11588406
- PMCID: PMC8101821
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2001.01136.x
Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension
Erratum in
- J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2001 Nov-Dec;3(6):395
Abstract
In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, the authors compared the antihypertensive efficacy of once-daily treatment with the new angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan (20 mg) with recommended starting doses of losartan (50 mg), valsartan (80 mg), and irbesartan (150 mg) in 588 patients with a cuff diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of greater than or equal to 100 and less than or equal to 115 mm Hg and a mean daytime DBP of greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg and less than 120 mm Hg, as measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Cuff and ambulatory blood pressures were monitored at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment. All groups were predominantly white and approximately 62% male, and their mean age was approximately 52 years. In all groups, mean baseline DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were approximately 104 and 157 mm Hg, respectively. The reduction of sitting cuff DBP with olmesartan (11.5 mm Hg), the primary efficacy variable of this study, was significantly greater than with losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan (8.2, 7.9, and 9.9 mm Hg, respectively). Reductions of cuff SBP with the four ARBs ranged from 8.4-11.3 mm Hg and were not significantly different. The reduction in mean 24-hour DBP with olmesartan (8.5 mm Hg) was significantly greater than reductions with losartan and valsartan (6.2 and 5.6 mm Hg, respectively) and showed a trend toward significance when compared to the reduction in DBP with irbesartan (7.4 mm Hg; p=0.087). The reduction in mean 24-hour SBP with olmesartan (12.5 mm Hg) was significantly greater than the reductions with losartan and valsartan (9.0 and 8.1 mm Hg, respectively) and equivalent to the reduction with irbesartan (11.3 mm Hg). All drugs were well tolerated. The authors conclude that olmesartan, at its starting dose, is more effective than the starting doses of the other ARBs tested in reducing cuff DBP in patients with essential hypertension.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005;5(1):41-50. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200505010-00006. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005. PMID: 15631537 Clinical Trial.
-
Olmesartan compared with other angiotensin II receptor antagonists: head-to-head trials.Clin Ther. 2004;26 Suppl A:A33-7. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90144-0. Clin Ther. 2004. PMID: 15291378 Review.
-
An ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study of the comparative antihypertensive efficacy of two angiotensin II receptor antagonists, irbesartan and valsartan.Blood Press Monit. 2002 Apr;7(2):135-42. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200204000-00008. Blood Press Monit. 2002. PMID: 12048432 Clinical Trial.
-
Blood pressure outcomes in patients receiving angiotensin II receptor blockers in primary care: a comparative effectiveness analysis from electronic medical record data.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Nov;13(11):801-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00539.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011. PMID: 22051424 Free PMC article.
-
Valsartan vs. other angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analytical approach.Int J Clin Pract. 2009 May;63(5):766-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02028.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2009. PMID: 19392925 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Rationale, study design, baseline characteristics and blood pressure at 16 weeks in the HONEST Study.Hypertens Res. 2013 Feb;36(2):177-82. doi: 10.1038/hr.2012.160. Epub 2012 Oct 25. Hypertens Res. 2013. PMID: 23096234 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of fimasartan in patients with arterial hypertension (Safe-KanArb study): an open-label observational study.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2013 Feb;13(1):47-56. doi: 10.1007/s40256-013-0004-9. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2013. PMID: 23344912 Free PMC article.
-
The role of olmesartan medoxomil in the management of hypertension.Drugs. 2004;64(24):2731-9. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464240-00002. Drugs. 2004. PMID: 15563246 Review.
-
Unveiling Wide Spectrum Therapeutic Implications and Signaling Mechanisms of Valsartan in Diverse Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.Curr Drug Res Rev. 2024;16(3):268-288. doi: 10.2174/2589977515666230717120828. Curr Drug Res Rev. 2024. PMID: 37461345 Review.
-
Effect of antihypertensive treatment on 24-h blood pressure variability: pooled individual data analysis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring studies based on olmesartan mono or combination treatment.J Hypertens. 2018 Apr;36(4):720-733. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001608. J Hypertens. 2018. PMID: 29045341 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Burnier M, Brunner HR. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Lancet. 2000;355:637–645. - PubMed
-
- Yanagisawa H, Amemiya Y, Kanazaki T, et al. Nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists: synthesis, biological activities, and structure‐activity relationships of imidazole‐5‐carboxyliv acids bearing alkyl, alkenyl, and hydroxyalkyl substituents at the 4‐position and their related compounds. J Med Chem. 1996;39:323–338. - PubMed
-
- Mizuno M, Sada T, Ikeda M, et al. Pharmacology of CS‐866, a novel nonpeptide angiotensin‐II receptor antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995;285:181–188. - PubMed
-
- Schwocho LR, Masonson HN. Pharmacokinetics of CS‐866, a new angiotensin‐II receptor blocker, in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;41:515–527. - PubMed
-
- Israili ZH. Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin‐II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2000;14(suppl 1):S73–S86. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical