Rofecoxib versus codeine/acetaminophen in postoperative dental pain: a double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active comparator-controlled clinical trial
- PMID: 11589259
- DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80119-3
Rofecoxib versus codeine/acetaminophen in postoperative dental pain: a double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active comparator-controlled clinical trial
Abstract
Background: In recent studies of acute pain and primary dysmenorrhea, rofecoxib, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that selectively targets the cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme, was found to be similar in efficacy to ibuprofen and naproxen sodium.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy of a single oral dose of rofecoxib 50 mg compared with the combination of codeine 60 mg/acetaminophen 600 mg in a model of postsurgical dental pain.
Methods: In this double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled, parallel-group study, patients experiencing moderate or severe pain after the surgical extraction of > or = 2 third molars, at least 1 of which was a mandibular impaction, were randomized to receive placebo, rofecoxib 50 mg, or codeine 60 mg/acetaminophen 600 mg. Patient evaluations of pain intensity, pain relief, and global assessments were recorded throughout the 24-hour period after dosing. The 2-stopwatch method was used to determine time to confirmed perceptible pain relief. The primary end point assessing overall analgesic effect was total pain relief over 6 hours (TOPAR6). Secondary end points were patient global assessment of response to therapy (PGART) at 6 hours, onset of analgesia, peak analgesic effect, and duration of analgesia.
Results: A total of 393 patients were enrolled; 182 received rofecoxib, 180 received codeine/acetaminophen, and 31 received placebo. The overall analgesic effect of rofecoxib 50 mg was greater than that of codeine 60 mg/acetaminophen 600 mg for TOPAR6 (12.4 vs 7.0; P < 0.001) and PGART at 6 hours (P < 0.001). The onset of analgesic effect was similar for rofecoxib and codeine/acetaminophen. Peak analgesic effect as measured by peak pain relief scores during the first 6 hours was significantly greater in the rofecoxib group compared with the codeine/acetaminophen group (P < 0.001), as was the duration of analgesic effect measured by the time to rescue analgesia (9.6 hours vs 2.3 hours, P < 0.001). Adverse events were reported in 33.0%, 46.1%, and 32.3% of patients treated with rofecoxib, codeine/acetaminophen, and placebo, respectively. The most common adverse events were nausea (6.0%, 25.0%, and 9.7%, respectively) and vomiting (3.8%, 18.3%, and 6.5%, respectively). Significantly more patients in the codeine/acetaminophen group than in the rofecoxib group experienced adverse events overall (P < 0.050) and nausea in particular (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: In this study of moderate to severe postoperative dental pain, the analgesic efficacy of rofecoxib 50 mg was greater than that of codeine/acetaminophen, with a lower incidence of adverse events and nausea.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of rofecoxib and oxycodone plus acetaminophen in the treatment of acute pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with moderate to severe postoperative pain in the third molar extraction model.Clin Ther. 2004 May;26(5):769-78. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90076-8. Clin Ther. 2004. PMID: 15220020 Clinical Trial.
-
Analgesic efficacy of rofecoxib compared with codeine/acetaminophen using a model of acute dental pain.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Oct;100(4):e74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.04.026. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005. PMID: 16182156 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of rofecoxib versus celecoxib in treating pain after dental surgery: a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled, parallel-group, single-dose study using the dental impaction pain model.Clin Ther. 2002 Oct;24(10):1549-60. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80059-5. Clin Ther. 2002. PMID: 12462285 Clinical Trial.
-
Pain Relief with Combination Acetaminophen/Codeine or Ibuprofen following Third-Molar Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pain Med. 2022 May 30;23(6):1176-1185. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab334. Pain Med. 2022. PMID: 34850186
-
Acetaminophen, aspirin, or Ibuprofen in combination analgesic products.Am J Ther. 2001 Nov-Dec;8(6):433-42. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200111000-00008. Am J Ther. 2001. PMID: 11704782 Review.
Cited by
-
Pain management today - what have we learned?Clin Rheumatol. 2006;25 Suppl 1:S2-8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-006-0311-5. Epub 2006 Jun 2. Clin Rheumatol. 2006. PMID: 16741780 Review.
-
Pain after elective arthroscopy of the knee: a prospective, randomised, study comparing conventional NSAID to coxib.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Nov;14(11):1166-70. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0081-2. Epub 2006 Jun 8. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006. PMID: 16761158 Clinical Trial.
-
Single-dose rofecoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults: a quantitative systematic review.BMC Anesthesiol. 2002 Jun 9;2(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-2-4. BMC Anesthesiol. 2002. PMID: 12069696 Free PMC article.
-
[Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors for postoperative pain therapy. Analgesic efficacy and adverse effects].Anaesthesist. 2004 Dec;53(12):1211-8. doi: 10.1007/s00101-004-0752-7. Anaesthesist. 2004. PMID: 15597162 Review. German.
-
Managing postoperative pain in adult outpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing codeine with NSAIDs.CMAJ. 2021 Jun 14;193(24):E895-E905. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201915. CMAJ. 2021. PMID: 34860688 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials