Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Sep-Oct;8(5):575-9.
doi: 10.1067/mnc.2001.115934.

Estimation of coronary flow reserve with the use of dynamic planar and SPECT images of Tc-99m tetrofosmin

Affiliations

Estimation of coronary flow reserve with the use of dynamic planar and SPECT images of Tc-99m tetrofosmin

H Sugihara et al. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: We developed a noninvasive method to examine coronary flow reserve with technetium 99m tetrofosmin based on the microsphere model. According to the microsphere model, myocardial blood flow (MBF) can be calculated by MBF = q / integral C(t)dt, where q is myocardial activity and C(t) is tracer concentration in blood. Because the ratio of integral C(t)dt at stress to rest is equal to the ratio of the first transit count in the pulmonary artery (PA) and attenuation factors were canceled out, we calculated the increase ratio of MBF (MBF(IR)).

Methods and results: After injection of dipyridamole, tetrofosmin was injected as a bolus and serial dynamic planar images were obtained to measure the first transit count in PA (PAC). Myocardial single photon emission computed tomography was performed to measure the regional myocardial count (RMC). MBF(IR) was calculated as [(RMCs x PACr)/(RMCr x PACs) - 1] x 100, where r and s denote resting and stress conditions, respectively. In contrast, the increase in the myocardial uptake ratio (MUR(IR)) was defined as (RMCs x SCr/RMCr x SCs - 1) x 100, where SC is syringe count of tracer. The results were as follows: (1) The mean MBF of healthy subjects was 46.9% +/- 22.8%. (2) MBF(IR) of the infarcted region and ischemic region was significantly decreased (8.3% +/- 12.2% and 11.2% +/- 11.9%, respectively; P <.001). (3) MUR(IR) was significantly lower than MBF(IR) (14.1% +/- 21.2%; P <.001). (4) MBF(IR) decreased according to the heart rate at rest (r = 0.47; P <.05).

Conclusions: MBF(IR) is a potential parameter with which to evaluate coronary flow reserve when the changes of arterial input function during stress are considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Circulation. 1987 Dec;76(6):1183-9 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1985 Jul;72(1):82-92 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1987 Jan;75(1 Pt 2):I6-11 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Apr;15(5):1032-42 - PubMed
    1. Cardiol Clin. 1997 Feb;15(1):101-29 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources