How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces?: a PET study of face categorical perception
- PMID: 11595103
- DOI: 10.1162/089892901753165917
How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces?: a PET study of face categorical perception
Abstract
Where and how does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces? This question has not been answered yet by neuroimaging studies partly because different tasks were performed on familiar and unfamiliar faces, or because familiar faces were associated with semantic and lexical information. Here eight subjects were trained during 3 days with a set of 30 faces. The familiarized faces were morphed with unfamiliar faces. Presented with continua of unfamiliar and familiar faces in a pilot experiment, a group of eight subjects presented a categorical perception of face familiarity: there was a sharp boundary in percentage of familiarity decisions between 40% and 60% faces. In the main experiment, subjects were scanned (PET) on the fourth day (after 3 days of training) in six conditions, all requiring a sex classification task. Completely novel faces (0%) were presented in Condition 1 and familiar faces (100%) in Condition 6, while faces of steps of 20% in the continuum of familiarity were presented in Conditions 2 to 5 (20% to 80%). A principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that most variations in neural responses were related to the dissociation between faces perceived as familiar (60% to 100%) and faces perceived as unfamiliar (0 to 40%). Subtraction analyses did not disclose any increase of activation for faces perceived as familiar while there were large relative increases for faces perceived as unfamiliar in several regions of the right occipito-temporal visual pathway. These changes were all categorical and were observed mainly in the right middle occipital gyrus, the right posterior fusiform gyrus, and the right inferotemporal cortex. These results show that (1) the discrimination between familiar and unfamiliar faces is related to relative increases in the right ventral pathway to unfamiliar/novel faces; (2) familiar and unfamiliar faces are discriminated in an all-or-none fashion rather than proportionally to their resemblance to stored representations; and (3) categorical perception of faces is associated with abrupt changes of brain activity in the regions that discriminate the two extremes of the multidimensional continuum.
Similar articles
-
Functional delineation of the human occipito-temporal areas related to face and scene processing. A PET study.Brain. 2000 Sep;123 ( Pt 9):1903-12. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.9.1903. Brain. 2000. PMID: 10960054
-
The functionally defined right occipital and fusiform "face areas" discriminate novel from visually familiar faces.Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):877-83. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00105-8. Neuroimage. 2003. PMID: 12880816 Clinical Trial.
-
Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.Brain Res. 2008 Sep 4;1228:177-88. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.092. Epub 2008 Jul 2. Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18634766 Clinical Trial.
-
The neural processing of familiar and unfamiliar faces: a review and synopsis.Br J Psychol. 2011 Nov;102(4):726-47. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02053.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25. Br J Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21988381 Review.
-
The neuroanatomic basis of facial perception and variable facial discrimination ability: implications for orthodontics.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Sep;132(3):293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.031. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17826596 Review.
Cited by
-
Reference repulsion in the categorical perception of biological motion.Vision Res. 2012 Jul 1;64:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 May 23. Vision Res. 2012. PMID: 22634421 Free PMC article.
-
Neurofunctional Signature of Hyperfamiliarity for Unknown Faces.PLoS One. 2015 Jul 8;10(7):e0129970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129970. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26154253 Free PMC article.
-
Developmental prosopagnosia and adaptative compensatory strategies: Case study.Dement Neuropsychol. 2008 Oct-Dec;2(4):353-355. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642009DN20400021. Dement Neuropsychol. 2008. PMID: 29213598 Free PMC article.
-
Shared or separate mechanisms for self-face and other-face processing? Evidence from adaptation.Front Psychol. 2012 Mar 7;3:66. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00066. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2012. PMID: 22408633 Free PMC article.
-
Tactile-to-Visual Cross-Modal Transfer of Texture Categorisation Following Training: An fMRI Study.Front Integr Neurosci. 2018 Jun 7;12:24. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2018.00024. eCollection 2018. Front Integr Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29946245 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources