Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Oct;16(10):979-88.
doi: 10.1080/104732201300367245.

A modified protocol for quantitative fit testing using the PortaCount

Affiliations

A modified protocol for quantitative fit testing using the PortaCount

A Sreenath et al. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001 Oct.

Abstract

A modified quantitative fit testing method has been developed for testing half masks using the TSI PortaCount respirator fit tester. This approach focuses on shortening the time for each exercise during fit testing; however, the shortened protocol is applied only to the very good-fitting masks. For marginal-fitting masks, the testing is carried out according to the full Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) respiratory protection standard (29CFR1910.134).(1) The shortened protocol (currently not approved by OSHA) still uses all the exercises required by the OSHA standard but for a shorter time (30 seconds [s] for each exercise instead of the usual 60 s). How good the fit has to be to qualify for a shortened exercise is determined by the statistical analysis of a large data set containing pass and fail fit-test data. The statistical analysis involves calculating the sensitivity and specificity of the pass and failed fit tests on half masks. From this analysis, a multiplication factor (K) to the OSHA pass/fail criterion was developed. For a respirator to undergo the shortened protocol, the fit factor obtained during any exercise must be K times the OSHA pass/fail criterion of 100 for half masks. Hence, this approach is more conservative than fit testing protocols that involve shortened exercises regardless of the fit. Nevertheless, this approach still saves time without compromising the accuracy of the fit test expressed in terms of sensitivity and specificity. For the existing data, 85 percent of the fit tests would have been performed according to the faster test protocol while only 15 percent of the tests would have been tested according to the full-length OSHA test protocol.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources