A modified staging classification for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
- PMID: 11606919
- DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2001.117722
A modified staging classification for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
Erratum in
- J Am Acad Dermatol 2002 Feb;46(2):250
Abstract
Background: Despite refinements in the diagnosis of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), since 1979 there have been no changes to the staging of CTCL used to classify mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.
Objective: We reviewed the current staging of CTCL and examined the usefulness of a new staging scheme for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.
Methods: We determined overall survival of 450 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome using the current and modified staging classifications.
Results: There were no significant differences between survival of patients with stage IB (patches/plaques involving greater than 10% body surface area) and IIA (peripheral adenopathy) disease and of patients with stage IIB (tumor) and III (erythroderma) disease. There was a significant difference in survival between patients with extensive patch versus extensive plaque stage disease. Modification of the current classification by splitting T2 into patch versus plaque stage disease and incorporating tumors and erythroderma into stage III proved superior to the current scheme in predicting overall survival.
Conclusion: Modification of the current staging classification for CTCL yields subgroups useful in the prognostic assessment of CTCL.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic factors and prediction of prognosis by the CTCL Severity Index in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.Br J Dermatol. 2005 Jul;153(1):118-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06676.x. Br J Dermatol. 2005. PMID: 16029336
-
Management of mycosis fungoides. Part 1. Diagnosis, staging, and prognosis.Oncology (Williston Park). 2003 Sep;17(9):1281-8. Oncology (Williston Park). 2003. PMID: 14569854 Review.
-
Long-term outcome of 525 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome: clinical prognostic factors and risk for disease progression.Arch Dermatol. 2003 Jul;139(7):857-66. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.7.857. Arch Dermatol. 2003. PMID: 12873880
-
Prognostic factors, prognostic indices and staging in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: where are we now?Br J Dermatol. 2014 Jun;170(6):1226-36. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12909. Br J Dermatol. 2014. PMID: 24641480 Review.
-
A practical approach to accurate classification and staging of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.Skin Therapy Lett. 2012 Dec;17(10):5-9. Skin Therapy Lett. 2012. PMID: 23223768 Review.
Cited by
-
Annular lesions in dermatology.Indian J Dermatol. 2013 Mar;58(2):157. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.108071. Indian J Dermatol. 2013. PMID: 23716818 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: clinical presentation, diagnosis, staging, and therapeutic management.Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 14;13:1141108. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1141108. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37124514 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Histopathologic Evaluation of Density and Depth of the Lymphoid Infiltrate in Clinically Defined Patches and Plaques in Early Stage Mycosis Fungoides.J Cutan Pathol. 2025 Jun;52(6):406-409. doi: 10.1111/cup.14810. Epub 2025 Apr 8. J Cutan Pathol. 2025. PMID: 40197624 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Diverse cutaneous manifestations associated with a single disease.Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2002 Oct;15(4):433-6. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2002.11927876. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2002. PMID: 16333475 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Pharmacogenetic contribution of leptin gene polymorphism in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2009;2(2):163-8. Epub 2008 Jul 18. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2009. PMID: 19079651 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical