Vaginally administered misoprostol for outpatient cervical ripening in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus
- PMID: 11641678
- DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.117306
Vaginally administered misoprostol for outpatient cervical ripening in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus
Abstract
Objective: To compare the use of vaginally administered misoprostol to placebo for outpatient labor induction in patients with diabetes.
Study design: In this double-masked, controlled clinical trial, pregnant women with diabetes and gestational age of >38(1/2) weeks were randomized to receive 25 microg misoprostol or placebo vaginally on days 1 and 4 of a 7-day outpatient cervical ripening period. If necessary, inpatient labor induction was managed by using a standard protocol.
Results: Of 120 women included in the study, 57 received misoprostol and 63 received placebo. Most of the women had been diagnosed with gestational (Class A) diabetes. Similar numbers of misoprostol and placebo-treated women delivered within 7 days of the first dose (31/57 [54%] vs 36/63 [57%], P =.63). The mean (+/-SEM) interval from induction to delivery was similar (8530.5 minutes +/-1439.7 minutes vs 6712.5 minutes +/-606.4 minutes, P =.23).
Conclusion: Vaginally administered misoprostol was no more effective than placebo in reducing the need for inpatient labor induction or the induction-delivery interval. Outpatient cervical ripening with use of vaginally administered misoprostol was well tolerated.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):911-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117358. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001. PMID: 11641677 Clinical Trial.
-
Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):906-10. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117303. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001. PMID: 11641676 Clinical Trial.
-
Outpatient misoprostol cervical ripening without subsequent induction of labor to prevent post-term pregnancy.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Jul;84(7):628-31. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00655.x. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005. PMID: 15954870 Clinical Trial.
-
Misoprostol (Cytotec): a new method of inducing labor.Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 1999 Spring;(49):22-30. Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 1999. PMID: 10488311 Review. No abstract available.
-
Is There a Place for Outpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening?Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017 Dec;44(4):583-591. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.08.010. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 29078940 Review.
Cited by
-
Outpatient Cervical Ripening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun 1;137(6):1091-1101. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004382. Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33752219 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of Outpatient Versus Inpatient Induction of Labor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2024 Sep 16;16(9):e69535. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69535. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39286471 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A core outcome set for the treatment of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes: an international consensus study.BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1855-1868. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16825. Epub 2021 Aug 3. BJOG. 2021. PMID: 34218508 Free PMC article.
-
Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CMAJ. 2014 Jun 10;186(9):665-73. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130925. Epub 2014 Apr 28. CMAJ. 2014. PMID: 24778358 Free PMC article.
-
A benefit-risk assessment of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction.Drug Saf. 2002;25(9):665-76. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200225090-00005. Drug Saf. 2002. PMID: 12137560 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical