Inadequacies with the ACOG and AAP statements on managing ethical conflict during the intrapartum period
- PMID: 11642910
Inadequacies with the ACOG and AAP statements on managing ethical conflict during the intrapartum period
Abstract
[The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists] takes the view that respect for the autonomy of the pregnant woman should be almost absolute and [the American Academy of Pediatrics] takes the view that respect for the autonomy of the pregnant woman should be limited or prima facie in character. ACOG's reading of this central bioethical principle admits of virtually no exceptions, while AAP's reading does allow exceptions....A complete account of obstetric ethics that would apply in clinical practice during the intrapartum period must take into account both negative and positive autonomy-based rights of the pregnant woman and beneficence-based obligations to the at-term fetus -- and to the pregnant woman, as well. Such an account will be, we believe, more clinically applicable than the accounts offered by ACOG and AAP.
Similar articles
-
Lives at stake: how to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life.Health Prog. 1992 Sep;73(3):18, 20-27. Health Prog. 1992. PMID: 11652082 No abstract available.
-
A serious obligation Sharpening a moral argument.Health Prog. 1992 Dec;73(10):6-7. Health Prog. 1992. PMID: 11645751 No abstract available.
-
Reflection on the physician's responsibility to mother and fetus.Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1993 Apr;26(2):109-12. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1993. PMID: 11659577 No abstract available.
-
Compelled cesarean section. An ethical perspective.Prim Care. 1993 Sep;20(3):721-8. Prim Care. 1993. PMID: 8378462 Review.
-
Ethical issues in recommending and offering fetal therapy.West J Med. 1993 Sep;159(3):369-99. West J Med. 1993. PMID: 11643180 Review. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous