Hummel v. Reiss
- PMID: 11648251
Hummel v. Reiss
Abstract
KIE: The New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirmed the dismissal of a malpractice action brought under "wrongful life" theory by a brain-damaged, multiply-handicapped 19-year-old. The defendant physician had refused to provide the plaintiff's mother with the treatment option of a therapeutic abortion because her health was threatened by a complicated pregnancy in 1971. However, the decision not to abort occurred prior to the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, when New Jersey did not allow abortions directed solely to eliminate a potentially defective fetus. At that time, the only legal duty was to the mother, to perform a therapeutic abortion if her health or life was endangered and no injury to the mother was claimed. The physician had no duty to advise, arrange for, or perform a eugenic abortion on a viable and probably handicapped fetus.
Similar articles
-
Hummel v. Reiss.Atl Report. 1992 Jul 21;608:1341-53. Atl Report. 1992. PMID: 11648253
-
Hummel v. Reiss: the New Jersey Supreme Court takes a step backward in its recognition of wrongful life.Rutgers Law Rev. 1993 Fall;46(1):535-63. Rutgers Law Rev. 1993. PMID: 11652806 No abstract available.
-
Selective abortion and the diagnosis of fetal damage: issues and concerns.J Assoc Pers Sev Handicaps. 1986 Autumn;11(3):188-95. doi: 10.1177/154079698601100306. J Assoc Pers Sev Handicaps. 1986. PMID: 11655848 No abstract available.
-
Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.J Leg Med. 1995 Dec;16(4):607-36. doi: 10.1080/01947649509510995. J Leg Med. 1995. PMID: 8568420 Review.
-
Wrongful life: a new generation.J Fam Law. 1988-1989;27(3):673-96. J Fam Law. 1988. PMID: 11659169 Review. No abstract available.