Being skeptical about the medical humanities
- PMID: 11654209
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02276583
Being skeptical about the medical humanities
Abstract
In this paper the author challenges the prevailing view that contemporary writing in the medical humanities is serving the needs of the various health care disciplines. The current medical humanities literature assumes that physicians are the appropriate target group. This is most notably the case within health care ethics literature. There appears to be an unexamined assumption that physician-centric approaches to clinical ethical decision-making are the standard by which appropriate ethical practice is judged. The author challenges this assumption and addresses the problems that this approach engenders. The medical humanities literature appears to reinforce hierarchical, patriarchal arrangements which are themselves not morally neutral.
Similar articles
-
Doubts about medical humanities.Health Care Anal. 1994 Nov;2(4):347-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02251084. Health Care Anal. 1994. PMID: 11645288
-
Teaching medical ethics.Q J Med. 1994 Dec;87(12):759-67. Q J Med. 1994. PMID: 11660145 Review. No abstract available.
-
Telling stories as a way of doing ethics.Conn Med. 1987 Nov;51(11):725-31. Conn Med. 1987. PMID: 11644106 No abstract available.
-
Anthropology and bioethics.Med Anthropol Q. 1992 Mar;6(1):49-73. doi: 10.1525/maq.1992.6.1.02a00040. Med Anthropol Q. 1992. PMID: 11659464 No abstract available.
-
Ethics consultation as moral engagement.Bioethics. 1991 Jan;5(1):44-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1991.tb00143.x. Bioethics. 1991. PMID: 11650947 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical