Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose
- PMID: 11656100
- DOI: 10.1300/J014v11n02_03
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose
Similar articles
-
Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.Am J Law Med. 1990 Jan 8;15(2-3):169-203. Am J Law Med. 1990. PMID: 11656584 No abstract available.
-
The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.Am J Law Med. 1989;15(2-3):169-203. Am J Law Med. 1989. PMID: 11644396 No abstract available.
-
Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.Wash Univ Law Q. 1985 Summer;63(2):183-236. Wash Univ Law Q. 1985. PMID: 11656658 No abstract available.
-
From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.PS (Wash DC). 1993 Mar;26(1):53-8. PS (Wash DC). 1993. PMID: 12085874 Review. No abstract available.
-
Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.J Leg Med. 1995 Dec;16(4):607-36. doi: 10.1080/01947649509510995. J Leg Med. 1995. PMID: 8568420 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical