Similar articles

• Avoiding family feuds: responding to surrogate demands for life-sustaining interventions.

  Alpers A, Lo B. Alpers A, et al. J Law Med Ethics. 1999 Spring;27(1):74-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1999.tb01438.x. J Law Med Ethics. 1999. PMID: 11657146 No abstract available.
• The doctor-proxy relationship: an untapped resource: introduction.

  Post LF, Blustein J, Dubler NN. Post LF, et al. J Law Med Ethics. 1999 Spring;27(1):5-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1999.tb01430.x. J Law Med Ethics. 1999. PMID: 11657143 No abstract available.
• Commentary: anxieties as a legal impediment to the doctor-proxy relationship.

  Kapp MB. Kapp MB. J Law Med Ethics. 1999 Spring;27(1):69-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1999.tb01437.x. J Law Med Ethics. 1999. PMID: 11657145 No abstract available.
• Deciding for others.

  Buchanan A, Brock DW. Buchanan A, et al. Milbank Q. 1986;64(Suppl. 2):17-94. Milbank Q. 1986. PMID: 11649884 Review.
• Surrogate decision making in neurocritical care.

  Adelman EE, Zahuranec DB. Adelman EE, et al. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2012 Jun;18(3):655-8. doi: 10.1212/01.CON.0000415433.91771.55. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2012. PMID: 22810254 Free PMC article. Review.