Similar articles

• Norplant bonuses and the unconstitutional conditions doctrine.

  Coale DS. Coale DS. Tex Law Rev. 1992 Nov;71(1):189-215. Tex Law Rev. 1992. PMID: 11656313 No abstract available.
• The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.

  Corns CA. Corns CA. Univ Mich J Law Reform. 1991 Winter;24(2):371-403. Univ Mich J Law Reform. 1991. PMID: 11656224 No abstract available.
• Norplant use in conjunction with the welfare system.

  Funk AM. Funk AM. South Calif Interdiscip Law J. 1993 Spring;2(1):147-63. South Calif Interdiscip Law J. 1993. PMID: 11652714 No abstract available.
• AIDS and the future of reproductive freedom.

  Bayer R. Bayer R. Milbank Q. 1990;68(Suppl. 2):179-204. Milbank Q. 1990. PMID: 11653914 Review.
• Providing subsidies and incentives for Norplant, sterilization and other contraception: allowing economic theory to inform ethical analysis.

  Mauldon JG. Mauldon JG. J Law Med Ethics. 2003 Fall;31(3):351-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00099.x. J Law Med Ethics. 2003. PMID: 14626544 Review. No abstract available.