Similar articles

• Biotechnology, patients' rights, and the Moore case.

  Howard JJ. Howard JJ. Food Drug Cosmet Law J. 1989 Jul;44(4):331-58. Food Drug Cosmet Law J. 1989. PMID: 11659209 No abstract available.
• Moore v. The Regents of the University of California: an ethical debate on informed consent and property rights in a patient's cells.

  Prowda JB. Prowda JB. J Pat Trademark Off Soc. 1995 Aug;77(8):611-39. J Pat Trademark Off Soc. 1995. PMID: 11658094 No abstract available.
• Biotechnology and the commercial use of human cells: toward an organic view of life and technology.

  Martin PA, Lagod ML. Martin PA, et al. Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J. 1989 Jun;5(2):211-61. Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J. 1989. PMID: 11659674 No abstract available.
• The gift of life: ethical problems and policies in obtaining and distributing organs for transplantation.

  Childress JF. Childress JF. Prim Care. 1986 Jun;13(2):379-94. Prim Care. 1986. PMID: 11644058 Review. No abstract available.
• Conflicts of interest: research and clinical care.

  Morris JC. Morris JC. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):49-57. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994. PMID: 11657673 Review.