Similar articles

• Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.

  Jones CJ. Jones CJ. Syracuse Law Rev. 1982 Summer;33(2):565-613. Syracuse Law Rev. 1982. PMID: 11658668 No abstract available.
• Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.

  Heller S. Heller S. Washburn Law J. 1990 Fall;30(1):15-28. Washburn Law J. 1990. PMID: 11659579 No abstract available.
• Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.

  Pine RN, Law SA. Pine RN, et al. Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev. 1992 Summer;27(2):407-63. Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev. 1992. PMID: 11656200 No abstract available.
• Abortion law in Europe in 1991-1992.

  Boland R. Boland R. J Law Med Ethics. 1993 Spring;21(1):72-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1993.tb01233.x. J Law Med Ethics. 1993. PMID: 11652126 Review.
• "Alas! poor Yorick," I knew him ex utero: the regulation of embryo and fetal experimentation and disposal in England and the United States.

  Terry NP. Terry NP. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 1986 Apr;39(3):419-70. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 1986. PMID: 11658869 Review. No abstract available.