Immediate on-site interpretation of fine-needle aspiration smears: a cost and compensation analysis
- PMID: 11668466
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.9046
Immediate on-site interpretation of fine-needle aspiration smears: a cost and compensation analysis
Abstract
Background: A significant body of literature exists supporting the cost effectiveness of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in the work-up of patients with potential neoplastic disease. Several authorities have stated that immediate, on-site smear evaluation by cytopathologists optimizes diagnostic accuracy and minimizes the technique's insufficiency rate. This favorable effect on FNA diagnostic accuracy is most pronounced for deep body sites, where FNA is guided by computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, bronchoscopy, or endoscopy. Little data exist regarding whether compensation from Medicare is adequate to support the pathologist in this endeavor compared with other potentially more remunerative activities, including routine surgical pathology sign-out, nongynecologic cytopathology sign-out, and frozen section consultation.
Methods: The authors studied a series of 142 fine-needle aspirates with immediate, on-site evaluations performed under a variety of clinical settings. These included bronchoscopic, endoscopic, ultrasound-guided, and CT-guided biopsies along with palpation-directed biopsies performed by either cytopathologists or clinicians. For these aspirates, total pathologist attendance time was calculated and correlated with guidance technique, target organ, location where aspirate was performed, and nature of aspirator. Fifty frozen section evaluations were timed similarly. For comparison purposes, cytopathologists' costs were calculated using the 80th percentile pay level of an associate professor with full-time clinical duties. Medicare rate schedules were used to calculate compensation. Including salary and benefits, the pathologist cost was approximately $88.83 per hour.
Results: On average, an intraprocedural FNA evaluation for a CT-guided biopsy required 48.7 minutes, an ultrasound-guided biopsy required 44.4 minutes of pathologist time, an endoscopic procedure required 56.2 minutes, a bronchoscopic procedure required 55.3 minutes, a clinic aspirate performed by a pathologist required 42.5 minutes, and a clinic FNA performed by a clinician required 34.7 minutes. The average frozen section required 15.7 minutes of pathologist time for performance and interpretation. With the exception of FNA performed in clinic by the cytopathologist, time costs exceeded compensation by $40-50 per procedure. Clinic aspirates performed by a clinician and immediately evaluated by a pathologist resulted in a deficit of approximately $18 over actual time cost.
Conclusions: From the current data, it appears that intraprocedural consultations by cytopathologists for CT-guided, ultrasound-guided, bronchoscopic, or endoscopic procedures are compensated insufficiently by current Medicare compensation schedules using the CPT code 88172 for on-site evaluation. Only when the cytopathologist personally performs the aspirate and immediately interprets it (CPT codes 88172 and 88170) does the Medicare payment adequately compensate for professional services.
Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Cytopathologist-Performed Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration With Cytopathologist-Performed Palpation-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Single Institutional Experience.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Oct;142(10):1260-1267. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0123-OA. Epub 2018 Apr 26. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018. PMID: 29697276
-
BSCC Code of Practice--fine needle aspiration cytology.Cytopathology. 2009 Oct;20(5):283-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2009.00709.x. Cytopathology. 2009. PMID: 19754835 Review.
-
Intraprocedural evaluation of fine-needle aspiration smears: how good are we?Diagn Cytopathol. 2012 Sep;40(9):760-3. doi: 10.1002/dc.21618. Epub 2011 Jan 6. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012. PMID: 22888082
-
Pretherapeutic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography.Dan Med J. 2012 Dec;59(12):B4568. Dan Med J. 2012. PMID: 23290296 Review.
-
Diagnostic value and cost-effectiveness of on-site evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens: review of 5,688 cases.Diagn Cytopathol. 2002 Jul;27(1):1-4. doi: 10.1002/dc.10065. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002. PMID: 12112806
Cited by
-
Diagnostic Efficacy of Cell Block and Liquid-Based Cytology for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Tumors.Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 3;35(8):665-674. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23609. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 39155569 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic telecytopathology of on site rapid cytology diagnoses for pancreatic carcinoma.Cytojournal. 2006 Dec 11;3:27. doi: 10.1186/1742-6413-3-27. Cytojournal. 2006. PMID: 17156485 Free PMC article.
-
Cytologic evaluation of image-guided fine needle aspiration biopsies via robotic microscopy: A validation study.J Pathol Inform. 2010 May 26;1:4. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.63826. J Pathol Inform. 2010. PMID: 20805959 Free PMC article.
-
Acquisition and processing of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens in the era of targeted lung cancer chemotherapy.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar 15;185(6):606-11. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201107-1199CI. Epub 2011 Oct 27. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012. PMID: 22071327 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic efficacy of the cell block method in comparison with smear cytology of tissue samples obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;45(8):868-75. doi: 10.1007/s00535-010-0217-5. Epub 2010 Feb 23. J Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 20177713