Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2001 Oct;16(10):663-7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.01111.x.

Productivity, quality, and patient satisfaction: comparison of part-time and full-time primary care physicians

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Productivity, quality, and patient satisfaction: comparison of part-time and full-time primary care physicians

D G Fairchild et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Oct.

Abstract

Context: Although few data are available, many believe that part-time primary care physicians (PCPs) are less productive and provide lower quality care than full-time PCPs. Some insurers exclude part-time PCPs from their provider networks.

Objective: To compare productivity, quality of preventive care, patient satisfaction, and risk-adjusted resource utilization of part-time and full-time PCPs.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Boston.

Participants: PCPs affiliated with 2 academic outpatient primary care networks.

Measurements: PCP productivity, patient satisfaction, resource utilization, and compliance with screening guidelines.

Results: Part-time PCP productivity was greater than that of full-time PCPs (2.1 work relative value units (RVUs)/bookable clinical hour versus 1.3 work RVUs/bookable clinical hour, P< .01). A similar proportion of part-time PCPs (80%) and full-time PCPs (75%) met targets for mammography, Pap smears, and cholesterol screening (P = .67). After adjusting for clinical case mix, practice location, gender, board certification status, and years in practice, resource utilization of part-time PCPs (138 dollars [95% confidence interval (CI), 108 dollars to 167 dollars]) was similar to that of full-time PCPs (139 dollars [95% CI, 108 dollars to 170 dollars], P = .92). Patient satisfaction was similar for part-time and full-time PCPs.

Conclusions: In these academic primary care practices, rates of patient satisfaction, compliance with screening guidelines, and resource utilization were similar for part-time PCPs compared to full-time PCPs. Productivity per clinical hour was markedly higher for part-time PCPs. Despite study limitations, these data suggest that academic part-time PCPs are at least as efficient as full-time PCPs and that the quality of their work is similar.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Adjusted mean expenses per member per month ($PMPM) adjusted for Ambulatory Care Group (ACG) weight, practice location, physician board status, gender and years in practice. Part-time versus full-time primary care physicians (PCPs) from Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital practicing during 1996 and 1997.

Comment in

  • Time is of the essence.
    Warde C. Warde C. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Oct;16(10):712-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.08020.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2001. PMID: 11679040 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Fritz NE, Lantos JD. Pediatricians' practice choices: differences between part-time and full-time practice. Pediatrics. 1991;88:764–9. - PubMed
    1. Heins M, Smock S, Jacobs J, Stein M. Productivity of women physicians. JAMA. 1976;236:1961–4. - PubMed
    1. Nonnemaker L. Women physicians in academic medicine. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:399–405. - PubMed
    1. Levinson W, Kaufman K, Bickel J. Part-time faculty in academic medicine: present status and future challenges. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:220–5. - PubMed
    1. Goldman L. Blueprint for a research career in general internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:341–4. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms