Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 Nov;91(11):1749-57.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1749.

Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms

Affiliations
Review

Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms

E K Ong et al. Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov.

Abstract

The tobacco industry has attacked "junk science" to discredit the evidence that secondhand smoke-among other environmental toxins-causes disease. Philip Morris used public relations firms and lawyers to develop a "sound science" program in the United States and Europe that involved recruiting other industries and issues to obscure the tobacco industry's role. The European "sound science" plans included a version of "good epidemiological practices" that would make it impossible to conclude that secondhand smoke-and thus other environmental toxins-caused diseases. Public health professionals need to be aware that the "sound science" movement is not an indigenous effort from within the profession to improve the quality of scientific discourse, but reflects sophisticated public relations campaigns controlled by industry executives and lawyers whose aim is to manipulate the standards of scientific proof to serve the corporate interests of their clients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hollingsworth P. The “junk science” dilemma. Am Scientist. 2000; 88:2–4.
    1. Huber P. Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1991.
    1. Schwartz J. Only good science to keep on debating “junk science.” Houston Chronicle. March 28, 1999:5
    1. Price J, Svitak L. It's time we took “junk science” out of the courtroom. Star-Tribune [Minneapolis]. June 20, 1999:5D.
    1. Price J, Rosenberg E. The war against junk science: the use of expert panels in complex medical-legal scientific litigation. Biomaterials. 1998;19: 1425–1432. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms