Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001:(3):CD001991.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001991.

Screening for lung cancer

Affiliations

Screening for lung cancer

R L Manser et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001.

Update in

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of screening for lung cancer with chest radiography, sputum cytology or spiral CT has not been established.

Objectives: To determine whether screening for lung cancer using regular sputum examinations or chest radiography or CT chest reduces lung cancer mortality.

Search strategy: Electronic databases, bibliographies, hand searching of a journal and discussion with experts were used to identify published and unpublished trials.

Selection criteria: Controlled trials of screening for lung cancer using sputum examinations, chest radiography or CT chest.

Data collection and analysis: Intention to screen analysis was performed. Where there was significant statistical heterogeneity relative risks were reported using the random effect model, but for other outcomes the fixed effect model was used.

Main results: Seven trials were included (6 randomised controlled studies and 1 non-randomised controlled trial) with a total of 245,610 subjects. There were no studies with an unscreened control group. Frequent screening with chest x-rays was associated with an 11% relative increase in mortality from lung cancer compared with less frequent screening (RR 1.11, CI: 1.00-1.23). A non statistically significant trend was observed to reduced mortality from lung cancer when screening with chest x-ray and sputum cytology was compared with chest x-ray alone (RR 0.88, CI:0.74-1.03). Several of the included studies had potential methodological weaknesses. There were no controlled studies of spiral CT.

Reviewer's conclusions: The current evidence does not support screening for lung cancer with chest radiography or sputum cytology. Frequent chest x-ray screening might be harmful. Further, methodologically rigorous trials are required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources