Revisiting speech interference in classrooms
- PMID: 11688542
Revisiting speech interference in classrooms
Abstract
A review of the effects of ambient noise and reverberation on speech intelligibility in classrooms has been completed because of the long-standing lack of agreement on preferred acoustical criteria for unconstrained speech accessibility and communication in educational facilities. An overwhelming body of evidence has been collected to suggest that noise levels in particular are usually far in excess of any reasonable prescription for optimal conditions for understanding speech in classrooms. Quite surprisingly, poor classroom acoustics seem to be the prevailing condition for both normally-hearing and hearing-impaired students with reported A-weighted ambient noise levels 4-37 dB above values currently agreed upon to provide optimal understanding. Revision of currently proposed room acoustic performance criteria to ensure speech accessibility for all students indicates the need for a guideline weighted for age and one for more vulnerable groups. For teens (12-year-olds and older) and young adults having normal speech processing in noise, ambient noise levels not exceeding 40 dBA are suggested as acceptable, and reverberation times of about 0.5 s are concluded to be optimum. Younger students, having normal speech processing in noise for their age, would require noise levels ranging from 39 dBA for 10-11-year-olds to only 28.5 dBA for 6-7-year-olds. By contrast, groups suspected of delayed speech processing in noise may require levels as low as only 21.5 dBA at age 6-7. As one would expect, these more vulnerable students would include the hearing-impaired in the course of language development and non-native listeners.
Similar articles
-
Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):336-44. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d3d514. Ear Hear. 2010. PMID: 20215967
-
Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Feb;125(2):922-33. doi: 10.1121/1.3058900. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009. PMID: 19206869
-
The intelligibility of speech in elementary school classrooms.J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Apr;123(4):2078-86. doi: 10.1121/1.2839285. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008. PMID: 18397015
-
Noise in open plan classrooms in primary schools: a review.Noise Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;12(49):225-34. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.70501. Noise Health. 2010. PMID: 20871177 Review.
-
[Noise and its interference over students in a classroom environment: literature review].Pro Fono. 2005 May-Aug;17(2):251-8. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872005000200014. Pro Fono. 2005. PMID: 16909535 Review. Portuguese.
Cited by
-
Semantic Cues Modulate Children's and Adults' Processing of Audio-Visual Face Mask Speech.Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 19;13:879156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879156. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35928422 Free PMC article.
-
Individual characteristics moderate listening effort in noisy classrooms.Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 31;13(1):14285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40660-1. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37652970 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Looking Behavior on Listening and Understanding in a Simulated Classroom.J Educ Audiol. 2014 Jan 1;20:24-33. J Educ Audiol. 2014. PMID: 26478719 Free PMC article.
-
An epidemiological prospective study of children's health and annoyance reactions to aircraft noise exposure in South Africa.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Jul 3;10(7):2760-77. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10072760. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23823713 Free PMC article.
-
Excessive noise levels are noted in kindergarten classrooms in the island of Crete.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Mar;271(3):483-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2442-z. Epub 2013 Mar 21. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014. PMID: 23515634
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous