Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2001 Nov;38(11):740-4.
doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.11.740.

High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation in clinical cytogenetics

Affiliations
Comparative Study

High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation in clinical cytogenetics

M Kirchhoff et al. J Med Genet. 2001 Nov.

Abstract

High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation (HR-CGH) is a diagnostic tool in our clinical cytogenetics laboratory. The present survey reports the results of 253 clinical cases in which 47 abnormalities were detected. Among 144 dysmorphic and mentally retarded subjects with a normal conventional karyotype, 15 (10%) had small deletions or duplications, of which 11 were interstitial. In addition, a case of mosaic trisomy 9 was detected. Among 25 dysmorphic and mentally retarded subjects carrying apparently balanced de novo translocations, four had deletions at translocation breakpoints and two had deletions elsewhere in the genome. Seventeen of 19 complex rearrangements were clarified by HR-CGH. A small supernumerary marker chromosome occurring with low frequency and the breakpoint of a mosaic r(18) case could not be clarified. Three of 19 other abnormalities could not be confirmed by HR-CGH. One was a Williams syndrome deletion and two were DiGeorge syndrome deletions, which were apparently below the resolution of HR-CGH. However, we were able to confirm Angelman and Prader-Willi syndrome deletions, which are about 3-5 Mb. We conclude that HR-CGH should be used for the evaluation of (1) dysmorphic and mentally retarded subjects where normal karyotyping has failed to show abnormalities, (2) dysmorphic and mentally retarded subjects carrying apparently balanced de novo translocations, (3) apparently balanced de novo translocations detected prenatally, and (4) for clarification of complex structural rearrangements.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Med Genet. 2000 Mar 6;91(1):74-82 - PubMed
    1. Prenat Diagn. 2000 Feb;20(2):123-31 - PubMed
    1. J Med Genet. 2000 Jun;37(6):401-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 May;66(5):1516-21 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;96(2):281-6 - PubMed

Publication types