Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Dec;58(12):818-22.
doi: 10.1136/oem.58.12.818.

The role of extended weekends in sickness absenteeism

Affiliations

The role of extended weekends in sickness absenteeism

J Vahtera et al. Occup Environ Med. 2001 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Employees are thought to lengthen their weekends by voluntary absenteeism, but the magnitude of such potentially reversible behaviour is not known.

Methods: A follow up study based on employers' registers on the dates of work contracts and absences in 27 541 permanent full time municipal employees in five towns during 1993-7. The absence rate on each weekday separately for all sick leaves and for 1 day sick leaves was determined.

Results: 3.4% of the male employees and 5.0% of the female employees were on sick leave daily. The mean rate of sickness absence was lowest on Mondays, after which it increased towards Wednesday, and remained on the same level for the rest of the week. This pattern applied to both sexes, to each year of the follow up, and across towns, age groups, and income groups. For 1 day sick leaves, representing 4.5% of the total sickness absenteeism, the rates of sick leave for Mondays and Fridays were 1.4 and 1.9 times greater than those for other weekdays. However, these excess rates account for less than 1% of all days lost due to sickness absenteeism. Extended weekend absences were more common in men, in young employees, and in those in a low socioeconomic position, and they varied between towns.

Conclusion: Extended weekends seem to contribute only marginally to the days lost due to sickness absenteeism.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jan;50(1):27-39 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2000 Apr 8;320(7240):971-5 - PubMed
    1. Occup Environ Med. 2001 Jun;58(6):420-4; quiz 424,410 - PubMed
    1. Occup Med. 1990 Oct-Dec;5(4):739-54 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1993 Feb 6;306(6874):361-6 - PubMed

Publication types