Radiographic damage in rheumatoid arthritis correlates with functional disability but not direct medical costs

Abstract

Objective: Few longitudinal data exist on the relationship between radiographic damage and self-reported functional disability and direct medical costs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We assessed these relationships.

Methods: One hundred thirty patients with RA (at time of the first available radiograph, mean age 56.6 yrs, 16.9% male, mean disease duration 16.8 yrs) were followed for up to 13.4 years. Semiannually, they reported on functional disability (0 = no difficulty, 3 = unable to do), global severity (0 = very well, 100 = very poor), pain (0 = no pain, 3 = severe pain), and health services utilization through completion of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Concurrent hand radiographs were scored for erosions and joint space narrowing using the Genant method and a single score summing both erosions and joint space narrowing for both hands was calculated (0 = no damage, 200 = maximum damage). The univariate association of functional disability, global severity, pain, or direct medical costs with concurrent radiographic damage was assessed through Spearman correlations and hierarchical regression models. The hierarchical models permit exploitation of the between-patient and within-patient variation present in our longitudinal data.

Results: At the time of the first available radiograph, mean (SD) levels of functional disability, global severity, and pain were 1.3 (0.7), 39.4 (21.0), and 1.1 (0.7), respectively. At entry into the study, the average radiograph score was 49.7 and upon leaving the study it was 66.9. Patients were followed an average of 6.7 years, with radiograph scores increasing at an average rate of 2.5 units/yr. The Spearman correlation [95% confidence interval (CI)] between average per-patient radiograph score and average per-patient HAQ disability index, average per-patient global severity, average per-patient pain score, and average per-patient direct medical costs was, respectively, 0.42 (0.26, 0.55), 0.23 (0.06, 0.39), 0.20 (0.03, 0.36), and 0.06 (-0.11, 0.23). The mean slope (95% CI) for disability on radiograph score was 0.0186 (0.0132, 0.0226), for severity on radiographs 0.1889 (0.1295, 0.2498), and for pain on radiographs 0.0057 (0.0027, 0.0084). As an example, over 10 years, a 25 unit (i.e., 50%) increase in radiograph scores would, on average, be associated with a 0.46 unit (i.e., 35%) increase in disability, a 4.72 unit (12%) increase in global severity score, and a 0.14 unit (13%) increase in pain, all expressed on the HAQ scales. There was little association between radiograph score and direct medical costs.

Conclusion: A clinically meaningful association exists between radiographic damage and self-reported functional disability, suggesting that interventions that slow radiographic progression may improve the patient's health status. Such a relationship was not observed between radiographic damage and direct medical costs.