[Standards, options and recommendations: nutritional support in palliative or terminal care of adult patients with progressive cancer]
- PMID: 11713035
[Standards, options and recommendations: nutritional support in palliative or terminal care of adult patients with progressive cancer]
Abstract
Context: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centers and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.
Objectives: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for nutritional support in adult patients with advanced or terminal cancer.
Methods: Data were identified by searching Medline, web sites and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 95 independent reviewers.
Results: The main recommendations for nutritional support in adult patients with advanced or terminal cancer are: 1) Palliative care has been defined in a consensual way and is governed by the law (standard). Nutritional support is a palliative care which aim is to maintain and restore the "well-being" of the patient (standard). 2) Digestive symptoms and nutritional troubles are frequently noted in patients with advanced or terminal cancer (standard, level of evidence B2). Karnofsky index (KPS) and performance status (PS) are functional scores with a prognostic value and have to be used (standard, level of evidence B2). 3) Anorexia has a bad predictive value in patients with advanced or terminal cancer (standard, level of evidence B2). 4) In France, patients with advanced or terminal cancer are referred to medical institutions, palliative care units or remained at home (standard). Patients need a multidisciplinary follow-up (standard). An active participation of patients and/or their family circle is very important and physicians have to pay attention for their opinions (standard). 5) Dietetic counseling can help patients to improve their alimentation and its drawbacks (standard). 6) Palliative nutritional care often includes medicinal treatments (standard). 7) Artificial nutrition can slow down nutritional degradation, avoid dehydration and improve quality of life in patients with advanced stage cancer (especially head and neck cancer for enteral nutrition and digestive occlusions for parenteral nutrition) and unable to eat adapted meals (standard, level of evidence C). 8) When life expectancy is below 3 months with a KPS 3/4 50% (or PS > 2), artificial nutrition is not recommended (recommendation, expert agreement). 9) The assessment of nutritional care in patients with advanced or terminal cancer has to include functional scores measurement, quality of life and satisfaction degree of the patient and/or their family (standard, expert agreement).
Similar articles
-
[Standards, Options and Recommendations for home parenteral or enteral nutrition in adult cancer patients].Bull Cancer. 2001 Jun;88(6):605-18. Bull Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11459708 French.
-
[Standards, options and recommendations for tumor markers in colorectal cancer].Bull Cancer. 2001 Dec;88(12):1177-206. Bull Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11792611 Review. French.
-
[Good clinical practice in nutritional management of head and neck cancer patients].Bull Cancer. 1999 Oct;86(10):843-54. Bull Cancer. 1999. PMID: 10572235 French.
-
[Good clinical practice in nutritional management in cancer patients: malnutrition and nutritional assessment].Bull Cancer. 1999 Dec;86(12):997-1016. Bull Cancer. 1999. PMID: 10660694 French.
-
[Standards, options and recommendations: Good clinical practice in the dietetic management of cancer patients: hospital catering].Bull Cancer. 2001 Oct;88(10):1007-18. Bull Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11713036 Review. French.
Cited by
-
[Malnutrition due to malignant bowel obstruction].Wien Med Wochenschr. 2006 May;156(9-10):305-8. doi: 10.1007/s10354-006-0295-4. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2006. PMID: 16830252 German.
-
Summary version of the Standards, Options and Recommendations for palliative or terminal nutrition in adults with progressive cancer (2001).Br J Cancer. 2003 Aug;89 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S107-10. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601092. Br J Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12915911 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
[Is invasive therapy (medically/ethically) justifiable nearing an end of life situation, if it is based on symptom control and quality of life?].Wien Med Wochenschr. 2014 Aug;164(15-16):308-12. doi: 10.1007/s10354-014-0298-5. Epub 2014 Aug 12. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2014. PMID: 25113105 German.
-
Standards, Guidelines, and Quality Measures for Successful Specialty Palliative Care Integration Into Oncology: Current Approaches and Future Directions.J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 20;38(9):987-994. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02440. Epub 2020 Feb 5. J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32023165 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non-surgical oncology - Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition, Chapter 19.Ger Med Sci. 2009 Nov 18;7:Doc09. doi: 10.3205/000068. Ger Med Sci. 2009. PMID: 20049066 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials