Debate: Subgroup analyses in clinical trials: fun to look at - but don't believe them!
- PMID: 11714402
- PMCID: PMC59592
- DOI: 10.1186/cvm-1-1-025
Debate: Subgroup analyses in clinical trials: fun to look at - but don't believe them!
Abstract
Analysis of subgroup results in a clinical trial is surprisingly unreliable, even in a large trial. This is the result of a combination of reduced statistical power, increased variance and the play of chance. Reliance on such analyses is likely to be more erroneous, and hence harmful, than application of the overall proportional (or relative) result in the whole trial to the estimate of absolute risk in that subgroup. Plausible explanations can usually be found for effects that are, in reality, simply due to the play of chance. When clinicians believe such subgroup analyses, there is a real danger of harm to the individual patient.
Similar articles
-
Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(33):1-56. doi: 10.3310/hta5330. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701102 Review.
-
DICE 2: a further investigation of the effects of chance in life, death and subgroup analyses.Int J Clin Pract. 2001 May;55(4):240-2. Int J Clin Pract. 2001. PMID: 11406908
-
Estimates of subgroup treatment effects in overall nonsignificant trials: To what extent should we believe in them?Pharm Stat. 2017 Jul;16(4):280-295. doi: 10.1002/pst.1810. Epub 2017 May 15. Pharm Stat. 2017. PMID: 28503861
-
Challenges of subgroup analyses in multinational clinical trials: experiences from the MERIT-HF trial.Am Heart J. 2001 Sep;142(3):502-11. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.117600. Am Heart J. 2001. PMID: 11526365 Clinical Trial.
-
Application of Clinical Trial Results to Clinical Practice.Dev Ophthalmol. 2017;60:175-189. doi: 10.1159/000459707. Epub 2017 Apr 20. Dev Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28427076 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of dexmedetomidine versus lorazepam on outcome in patients with sepsis: an a priori-designed analysis of the MENDS randomized controlled trial.Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R38. doi: 10.1186/cc8916. Epub 2010 Mar 16. Crit Care. 2010. PMID: 20233428 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Towards the multileveled and processual conceptualisation of racialised individuals in biomedical research.Synthese. 2023;201(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-04004-2. Epub 2022 Dec 28. Synthese. 2023. PMID: 36591336 Free PMC article.
-
Mortality benefits from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy are not restricted to patients with remote myocardial infarction: an analysis from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT).Heart Rhythm. 2011 Mar;8(3):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.11.033. Epub 2010 Nov 23. Heart Rhythm. 2011. PMID: 21109025 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Interleukin-1 beta inhibition with canakinumab and reducing lung cancer-subset analysis of the canakinumab anti-inflammatory thrombosis outcome study trial (CANTOS).J Thorac Dis. 2018 Sep;10(Suppl 26):S3084-S3087. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.50. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 30370085 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 130,000 individuals shows smoking does not modify the association of APOE genotype on risk of coronary heart disease.Atherosclerosis. 2014 Nov;237(1):5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.07.038. Epub 2014 Aug 15. Atherosclerosis. 2014. PMID: 25173947 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Collins R, Peto R, Gray R, Parish S. Large-scale randomized evidence: trials and overviews. Oxford Textbook of Medicine, edn 3. Edited by Weatherall DJ, Ledingham JGG, Warrell DA. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1996. pp. 21–32.
-
- Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Niskanen L, Lanke J, Hedner T, Niklason A, Luomanmaki K, Dahlof B, de Faire U, Morlin C, Karlberg BE, Wester PO, Bjorck JE. Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial. . Lancet. 1999;353:611–616. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05012-0. - DOI - PubMed
-
- ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet. 1988;ii:349–360. - PubMed
-
- The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators Effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:145–153. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001203420301. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet . 1994;343:311–322. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91161-4. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources