This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comparative Study

. 2001 Nov 10;358(9293):1645-6.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06679-X.

Conventional insemination versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection

M Tucker, J Graham, T Han, R Stillman, M Levy

PMID: 11716920
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06679-X

Comparative Study

Conventional insemination versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection

M Tucker et al. Lancet. 2001.

. 2001 Nov 10;358(9293):1645-6.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06679-X.

Authors

M Tucker, J Graham, T Han, R Stillman, M Levy

PMID: 11716920
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06679-X

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Conventional in-vitro fertilisation versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial.
Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MP, Shaaban M, Khalaf Y, Seddler M, Ghobara T, Braude P, Kennedy R, Rutherford A, Hartshorne G, Templeton A. Bhattacharya S, et al. Lancet. 2001 Jun 30;357(9274):2075-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)05179-5. Lancet. 2001. PMID: 11445099 Clinical Trial.

Publication types

Actions
Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Elsevier Science