Evaluation of once-daily antihypertensive therapy
- PMID: 11728257
Evaluation of once-daily antihypertensive therapy
Abstract
The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of Hypertension report has recommended long-acting, once-daily drugs as preferred therapy for the management of hypertension. The duration of action of an antihypertensive agent can be assessed in several ways. The decrease in clinical blood pressure at the end of the dosing interval has traditionally been the method for determining antihypertensive efficacy. However, this approach does not provide information about a drug's effects over the remainder of the 24-hour dosing interval. The trough-to-peak ratio has been proposed as an arithmetic index of a compound's maximum and minimum antihypertensive effects. This ratio can be obtained from multiple readings in an office setting or using data from 24-hour ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring. A simplified approach has been to compare a single office reading at the time of a drug's known maximum antihypertensive effect (peak) with the reduction in blood pressure at 24 hours (trough). Office readings have also been used to show that the same dose of a drug given once daily versus twice daily results in a similar trough blood pressure, confirming that once-daily therapy is appropriate. The 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure can be used to determine mean changes in daytime, evening, and night-time blood pressure to demonstrate the antihypertensive profile over the entire dosing interval. Finally, the finding of a persistent reduction in ambulatory blood pressure following substitution of placebo for an antihypertensive drug during chronic therapy (missed-dose technique) suggests that a compound decreases blood pressure for 48 hours or longer. Thus, it should be possible to demonstrate the effectiveness of once-daily antihypertensive therapy using one or more of the aforementioned methods.
Similar articles
-
What are the approaches for evaluating antihypertensive treatment by 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?Blood Press Monit. 1999;4 Suppl 2:S23-8. Blood Press Monit. 1999. PMID: 10822419 Review.
-
Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.003. Clin Ther. 2004. PMID: 15531006 Clinical Trial.
-
Use of trough:peak ratio in the assessment of antihypertensive drug therapy.Can J Cardiol. 1994 Nov;10 Suppl D:17D-20D. Can J Cardiol. 1994. PMID: 7954034 Review.
-
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis of hypertension and evaluation of antihypertensive drug efficacy.Blood Press Suppl. 1994;2:20-2. Blood Press Suppl. 1994. PMID: 8061841 Review.
-
Treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with calcium channel blockers: a multicentre comparison of once-daily nifedipine GITS with once-daily amlodipine.Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(3):226-37. doi: 10.1185/030079903125001677. Curr Med Res Opin. 2003. PMID: 12803737 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Masked uncontrolled hypertension in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.Hypertens Res. 2017 Sep;40(9):819-824. doi: 10.1038/hr.2017.48. Epub 2017 Apr 6. Hypertens Res. 2017. PMID: 28381875
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical