Understanding why we agree on the evidence but disagree on the medicine
- PMID: 11728303
Understanding why we agree on the evidence but disagree on the medicine
Abstract
Despite the fact that physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists share a common training in scientific evidence and frequently share a common understanding of the evidence, debates occur about the proper management of individual patients. Clinicians may interpret this as a failure of evidence-based medicine, when, in fact, evidence is only one of many factors that play a role in clinical decision-making. By clearly understanding the other factors that affect clinical decision making-prior beliefs about treatment effectiveness, patient and clinician values, and clinical expertise-clinicians can better understand which clinical disagreements are about scientific evidence and which are about other factors.
Similar articles
-
The limits of evidence-based medicine.Respir Care. 2001 Dec;46(12):1435-40; discussion 1440-1. Respir Care. 2001. PMID: 11728302 Review.
-
The impact of an online evidence system on confidence in decision making in a controlled setting.Med Decis Making. 2005 Mar-Apr;25(2):178-85. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05275155. Med Decis Making. 2005. PMID: 15800302
-
Protocol for the Quick Clinical study: a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of an online evidence retrieval system on decision-making in general practice.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Aug 24;6:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-33. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006. PMID: 16928282 Free PMC article.
-
Why are physicians not persuaded by scientific evidence? A grounded theory interview study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 27;6:92. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-92. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006. PMID: 16872522 Free PMC article.
-
What is evidence-based medicine and why should it be practiced?Respir Care. 2001 Nov;46(11):1201-14. Respir Care. 2001. PMID: 11679142 Review.
Cited by
-
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients: integrating evidence and judgment using a decision analysis.Intensive Care Med. 2006 Aug;32(8):1151-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0244-0. Epub 2006 Jun 21. Intensive Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16788804
-
Mechanisms in clinical practice: use and justification.Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Mar;23(1):115-124. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09915-5. Med Health Care Philos. 2020. PMID: 31317304
-
Contextual factors in clinical decision making: national survey of Canadian family physicians.Can Fam Physician. 2005 Aug;51(8):1106-7. Can Fam Physician. 2005. PMID: 16926949 Free PMC article.
-
Pro/con clinical debate: the use of prone positioning in the management of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Crit Care. 2002 Feb;6(1):15-7. doi: 10.1186/cc1447. Epub 2002 Jan 17. Crit Care. 2002. PMID: 11940260 Free PMC article.
-
Adjuvants to mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome.Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):775-778. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4327-2. Epub 2016 Mar 29. Intensive Care Med. 2016. PMID: 27022981 Review. No abstract available.