Short-term outcome of newborn infants: spinal versus general anesthesia for elective cesarean section. A prospective randomized study
- PMID: 11728657
- DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00417-1
Short-term outcome of newborn infants: spinal versus general anesthesia for elective cesarean section. A prospective randomized study
Abstract
Objective: To compare general and spinal anesthesia with respect to the short-term outcome of newborns born by elective cesarean deliveries.
Methods: Pregnant women admitted to our hospital from January 1999 to July 2000, for whom elective repeat cesareans were planned after 37 weeks gestation, were allocated randomly after their informed consent to spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia. Maternal age, gestational age, birth weight, Apgar's score, hospital stay duration, and duration of cesarean section time were all noted. The rate of the neonatal respiratory depression, perinatal asphyxia, and admittance to the neonatal intensive care unit of the infants were documented. We also studied arterial samples withdrawn from the cord for the pH, bicarbonate, PaO(2) (oxygen pressure, arterial), and PaCO(2) (carbon dioxide pressure, arterial). The serum levels of creatine kinase with myocardial-specific isoform, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and total cortisol levels of the newborns were measured and served in ruling out perinatal stress and in confirming the diagnosis of perinatal asphyxia (and of myocardial damage). Statistical analyses was performed with the use of an unpaired Student's t-test, Chi-square test, and a power calculation was done.
Results: From the randomly selected patients, we had 38 (45.2%) infants for general anesthesia and 46 (54.8%) for spinal anesthesia. None of our primary endpoints favored any of the study groups, and the clinical short-term outcome of the infants was similar in the neonates born both by spinal and general anesthesia (P>0.05). The biochemical assays did not rule out or confirm any differences in the occurrence of perinatal stress (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Anesthesia type does not seem to influence the short-term outcome of the newborn infants for the elective cesarean deliveries. We believe that both spinal and general anesthesia could be performed in elective term cesarean deliveries without any risk to the newborn infants.
Similar articles
-
Spinal and epidural versus general anesthesia for elective cesarean section at term: effect on the acid-base status of the mother and newborn.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003 Apr;13(4):260-6. doi: 10.1080/jmf.13.4.260.266. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003. PMID: 12854928 Clinical Trial.
-
[Effects of general anesthesia for cesarean section on infants].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Mar;41(3):162-4. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2006. PMID: 16640879 Chinese.
-
Impact of interval between induction of spinal anesthesia to delivery on umbilical arterial cord ph of neonates delivered by elective cesarean section.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04536-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 35300620 Free PMC article.
-
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009. Semin Perinatol. 2006. PMID: 17011400 Review.
-
General versus Regional Anesthesia and Neonatal Data: A Propensity-Score-Matched Study.Am J Perinatol. 2023 Feb;40(3):227-234. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757861. Epub 2022 Oct 1. Am J Perinatol. 2023. PMID: 36181759 Review.
Cited by
-
[Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017 Nov;167(15-16):374-389. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0584-0. Epub 2017 Jul 25. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017. PMID: 28744777 Review. German.
-
Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes among patients undergoing cesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.Sao Paulo Med J. 2015 May-Jun;133(3):227-34. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.8901012. Epub 2015 Jun 1. Sao Paulo Med J. 2015. PMID: 26176927 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Influence of anaesthetic technique on maternal and foetal outcome in category 1 caesarean sections - A prospective single-centre observational study.Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;62(11):844-850. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_406_18. Indian J Anaesth. 2018. PMID: 30532319 Free PMC article.
-
Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 25;2014(1):CD010108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010108.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24464831 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the effect of general and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section on maternal and fetal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Jan;16(1):49-55. doi: 10.17085/apm.20072. Epub 2021 Jan 4. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021. PMID: 33389986 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources