Comparison of L-type and mixed L- and T-type calcium channel blockers on kidney injury caused by deoxycorticosterone-salt hypertension in rats

Abstract

The efficiency of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in the treatment of chronic renal disease (CRD) is controversial. In this study, we investigated whether combined T- and L-type CCBs, using mibefradil (30 mg/kg/d), provided superior protection versus traditional L-type voltage-gated CCBs, using amlodipine (10 mg/kg/d), in the deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt model of high glomerular blood pressure (P(GC)) and rapidly developing kidney damage. After 4 to 5 weeks of DOCA-salt, amlodipine did not reduce proteinuria (protein, 341 +/- 90 versus 482 +/- 54 mg/24 h; P = not significant) or degree of glomerular damage (20% +/- 4% versus 28% +/- 6% damaged glomeruli; P = not significant) compared with untreated rats. Conversely, mibefradil reduced proteinuria and glomerular damage versus untreated DOCA-salt rats (protein, 244 +/- 75 mg/24 h; P < 0.02; damaged glomeruli, 11% +/- 3%; P < 0.05). Both CCBs had similar antihypertensive actions, returning blood pressure to the untreated sham value. Of note, P(GC) also was reduced by a similar extent (and to the sham value) with both mibefradil (58 +/- 2 mm Hg; P < 0.001) and amlodipine (61 +/- 2 mm Hg; P < 0.005) versus untreated DOCA-salt rats (70 +/- 1 mm Hg). This study shows that combined T- and L-type CCBs provide superior protection against CRD in the DOCA-salt model compared with L-type CCBs alone. However, this protection was not hemodynamic because similar systemic and glomerular antihypertensive responses occurred with both mibefradil and amlodipine. Although mibefradil was withdrawn from the market because of adverse drug interactions not associated with CCBs, other mixed channel blockers may provide an alternative or adjunctive therapy to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in CRD.