Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Dec;59(12):1390-5; discussion 1395-6.
doi: 10.1053/joms.2001.27524.

Repair of orbital floor fractures with bioactive glass implants

Affiliations

Repair of orbital floor fractures with bioactive glass implants

K Aitasalo et al. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: The ideal management of orbital floor fractures has been highly controversial. Many implants, both autogenous and alloplastic, have been used to span the defects. This study evaluated the use of bioactive glass implants (BAG-implant, S53P4; Abmin Technologies Ltd, Turku, Finland) for the repair of orbital floor defects caused by blunt facial trauma.

Patients and methods: This retrospective review of 36 patients was carried out from 1995 to 1999. All patients were diagnosed with an orbital floor fracture or a large orbital blowout fracture. The BAG-implant was placed over the defect, using a subciliary or transconjunctival approach. No screw fixation was used when the implant was the correct size. Follow-up examination was done at 1 and 3 months after surgery. Twenty-eight (82%) of the patients were also seen at one-year follow-up (21 men and 7 women).

Results: The implants did not cause a foreign body reaction in the bone or soft tissue. There was no sign of resorption or infection, nor postoperative extrusion, hemorrhage, or displacement of the implant. Diplopia was seen preoperatively in 17 cases (61%) and postoperatively in 5 cases (18%). In 1 patient, the implant was removed 3 months after operation because of diplopia. Infraorbital nerve paresthesia was seen preoperatively in 9 patients (32%) and postoperatively in 5 patients (18%). The functional and cosmetic results were good at the 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion: The BAG-implant is a well-tolerated material in orbital floor reconstruction. It provides a favorable environment for an uncomplicated healing process because it is bioactive and biocompatible and because it causes new bone formation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources