Peripheral vascular surgery and magnetic resonance arteriography--a review

Abstract

Objectives: to review the current status of lower limb MRA.

Design: a literature review based predominantly on a MEDLINE database search of English-language publications from January 1991 to October 2000.

Materials and methods: twenty-eight articles, concerning non-enhanced MRA (13), gadolinium-enhanced MRA (14) or both (1), met the predefined requirement for quality. Results gadolinium-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) seems to be more accurate, quicker and associated with fewer problems than non-enhanced (TOF) MRA. TOF-MRA has a sensitivity and specificity of 93% (range 64-100%) and 88% (range 57-100%) respectively, and CE-MRA presents values of 96% (range 71-100%) and 96% (63-100%), respectively, using conventional arteriography as the gold standard. Some articles report a substantial incidence of runoff vessels suitable for distal bypass visible on MRA but invisible on conventional arteriography. Gadolinium contrast is given intravenously and is generally well tolerated and has no known nephrotoxicity.

Conclusion: CE-MRA is accurate compared to conventional arteriography, has the potential to increase the limb salvage rate for selected patients, is non-invasive and well tolerated.