Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Dec;51(6):1173-6.
doi: 10.1097/00005373-200112000-00025.

Do we really need routine computed tomographic scanning in the primary evaluation of blunt chest trauma in patients with "normal" chest radiograph?

Affiliations

Do we really need routine computed tomographic scanning in the primary evaluation of blunt chest trauma in patients with "normal" chest radiograph?

A K Exadaktylos et al. J Trauma. 2001 Dec.

Abstract

Background: A major cause of morbidity and mortality after blunt chest trauma remains undetected injuries. This study evaluates the role of routine computed tomographic (CT) scan.

Methods: We studied 93 consecutive patients from January 1999 to July 2000: 73 (76.3%) after motor vehicle crash with crash speed > 10 mph, and 22 (23.7%) after fall from height > 5 ft. Simultaneous with initial clinical evaluation, anteroposterior chest radiograph and helical chest CT scan were obtained for all patients.

Results: Sixty-eight patients (73.1%) showed at least one pathologic sign on chest radiograph, and 25 patients (26.9%) had normal chest radiograph. In 13 (52.0%) of these 25 patients, the CT scan showed multiple injuries; among these were two aortic lacerations, three pleural effusions, and one pericardial effusion.

Conclusion: Over 50% of patients with normal initial chest radiograph showed multiple injuries on the CT scan, among which were also two (8%) potentially fatal aortic lesions. We therefore recommend primary routine chest CT scan in all patients with major chest trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types