Reliability of fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with associated microvascular dysfunction: importance of flow on translesional pressure gradient
- PMID: 11747174
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.2005
Reliability of fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with associated microvascular dysfunction: importance of flow on translesional pressure gradient
Erratum in
- Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 Apr;55(4):531
Abstract
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been applied with success as a lesion-specific functional indicator of stenosis severity, at least in patients with normal microcirculation. This study sought to assess the reliability of FFR calculations in patients with associated microvascular dysfunction (e.g., post myocardial infarction, or post-MI). First, the effect of coronary flow changes on translesional pressure gradient was assessed. Therefore, intracoronary pressure and flow was recorded simultaneously across 19 non-infarct-related lesions (both pre- and postinterventional lesions with a mean diameter stenosis of 47% +/- 12%). Measurements were performed by means of a pressure and Doppler wire during maximal hyperemia and also during submaximal hyperemia induced by low-dose adenosine. The drop of coronary flow from 48 +/- 23 ml/min during maximal hyperemia to 36 +/- 18 ml/min during submaximal hyperemia was associated with a small decrease in translesional pressure gradient (from 22 +/- 12 mm Hg to 19 +/- 12 mm Hg; P = 0.02) and a small increase in the mean distal/arterial pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) going from 77% +/- 11% to 81% +/- 11% (P = 0.003). Then, intracoronary pressure and flow measurements were compared across 21 non-infarct-related lesions vs. 22 matched infarct-related lesions. For a similar angiographic stenosis severity (% DS = +/- 44%), maximal flow was 48 +/- 22 ml/min in the non-infarct arteries and 37 +/- 26 ml/min in the infarct arteries (P = 0.03), confirming the presence of severe microvascular dysfunction in infarct regions. Similar to the earlier findings, this hyperemic flow reduction in MI patients was associated with a small increase of FFR (= Pd/Pa): 79% +/- 12% in no MI vs. 83% +/- 12% in MI patients (P = 0.3). A reduction of hyperemic flow by +25%, [correction] such as can be found in patients with severely impaired microvascular function, has a limited effect on FFR calculations (+ 5%). This finding allows the application of standard FFR calculations in a more general population of ischemic heart disease, including patients with recent MI.
Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Comment in
-
FFR for all.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Dec;54(4):435-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1306. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001. PMID: 11747175 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The relationship between the basal coronary translesional pressure ratio and fractional flow reserve.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 1;90(5):745-753. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27027. Epub 2017 Aug 2. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28766832
-
The use of the acute Pd/Pa drop after intracoronary nitroglycerin infusion to rule out significant FFR: CANICA (Can intracoronary nitroglycerin predict fractional flow reserve without adenosine?) multicenter study.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 1;87(2):262-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25983. Epub 2015 Jul 25. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 26213338
-
Comparison between non-invasive coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve to assess the functional significance of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Apr;24(4):374-81. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.12.007. Epub 2011 Feb 26. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011. PMID: 21353763
-
Pooled diagnostic accuracy of resting distal to aortic coronary pressure referenced to fractional flow reserve: The importance of resting coronary physiology.J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):588-598. doi: 10.1111/joic.12517. Epub 2018 Apr 29. J Interv Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29707808 Review.
-
Fractional flow reserve: physiological basis, advantages and limitations, and potential gender differences.Curr Cardiol Rev. 2015;11(3):209-19. doi: 10.2174/1573403x10666141020113318. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2015. PMID: 25329922 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Association of Lower Fractional Flow Reserve Values With Higher Risk of Adverse Cardiac Events for Lesions Deferred Revascularization Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Aug 19;4(8):e002172. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002172. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015. PMID: 26289346 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Varying Hemodynamic and Vascular Conditions on Fractional Flow Reserve: An In Vitro Study.J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 30;5(7):e003634. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003634. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016. PMID: 27364988 Free PMC article.
-
The Complexity of Physiology in the Evaluation of the Effect of Medication for Cardiovascular Disease.JACC Asia. 2022 Nov 1;2(6):704-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.08.002. eCollection 2022 Nov. JACC Asia. 2022. PMID: 36444325 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Relevance of Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve: Art-of-state.Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 May 20;128(10):1399-406. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.156805. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015. PMID: 25963364 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prognostic Impact of Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 2;11(15):e025841. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025841. Epub 2022 Jul 25. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35876408 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources