Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2001 Dec 14;85(12):1842-9.
doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2182.

Validating automated screening for psychological distress by means of computer touchscreens for use in routine oncology practice

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Comparative Study

Validating automated screening for psychological distress by means of computer touchscreens for use in routine oncology practice

A Cull et al. Br J Cancer. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

The aim of the study was to confirm the validity of using touchscreen computers for screening for clinically significant levels of distress among cancer patients in routine oncology practice. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), EORTC Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ-C30), Mental Health Inventory-MHI5 and a Concerns Checklist were administered via touchscreen computer to 172 chemotherapy out-patients, twice, 2-4 weeks apart. A standard psychiatric interview (Present State Examination - PSE) was conducted within a week of the second assessment. On interview, 23% of patients were identified as 'cases'. Using the available data (questionnaires, sociodemographic details, self-reported past psychiatric history), the best screening strategy combined scores from MHI-5 and HADS from a single time-point with the following rules: if MHI-5 < 11 = non-case; if MHI-5 > or = 11 then use HADS; then, if HADS > or = 9 = 'case' (sensitivity 85%; specificity 71%; misclassification rate 26%; positive predictive value 47%). The computerized screening system enabled data to be collected, scored, collated and reported in real time to identify patients who warrant further clinical assessment. It offers the potential for improving 'case' detection in routine oncology practice while reducing the burden of questions put to 'non-cases'. Further work is needed to develop optimal choice of screening questions for this purpose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. BMJ. 2001 Feb 17;322(7283):406-9 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1997 Jun 7;314(7095):1679-81 - PubMed
    1. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;44(6):550-5 - PubMed
    1. Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Jan;156:79-83 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 1991 Feb;29(2):169-76 - PubMed